Uses of NHANES Biomarker Data for Chemical Risk Assessment: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

Abstract

BackgroundEach year, the U.S. NHANES measures hundreds of chemical biomarkers in samples from thousands of study participants. These biomarker measurements are used to establish population reference ranges, track exposure trends, identify population subsets with elevated exposures, and prioritize research needs. There is now interest in further utilizing the NHANES data to inform chemical risk assessments.ObjectivesThis article highlights a) the extent to which U.S. NHANES chemical biomarker data have been evaluated, b) groups of chemicals that have been studied, c) data analysis approaches and challenges, and d) opportunities for using these data to inform risk assessments.MethodsA literature search (1999–2013) was performed to identify publications in which U.S. NHANES data were reported. Manual curation identified only the subset of publications that clearly utilized chemical biomarker data. This subset was evaluated for chemical groupings, data analysis approaches, and overall trends.ResultsA small percentage of the sampled NHANES-related publications reported on chemical biomarkers (8% yearly average). Of 11 chemical groups, metals/metalloids were most frequently evaluated (49%), followed by pesticides (9%) and environmental phenols (7%). Studies of multiple chemical groups were also common (8%). Publications linking chemical biomarkers to health metrics have increased dramatically in recent years. New studies are addressing challenges related to NHANES data interpretation in health risk contexts.ConclusionsThis article demonstrates growing use of NHANES chemical biomarker data in studies that can impact risk assessments. Best practices for analysis and interpretation must be defined and adopted to allow the full potential of NHANES to be realized.CitationSobus JR, DeWoskin RS, Tan YM, Pleil JD, Phillips MB, George BJ, Christensen K, Schreinemachers DM, Williams MA, Cohen Hubal EA, Edwards SW. 2015. Uses of NHANES biomarker data for chemical risk assessment: trends, challenges, and opportunities. Environ Health Perspect 123:919–927; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409177

Prevalence and associated demographic characteristics of exposure to multiple metals and their species in human populations: The United States NHANES, 2007–2012

“…This program includes limited assessment of the sources or routes of exposure, but identifies individual, rather than combinations of, environmental chemicals of significance in blood and urine specimens [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2009]. Recent studies showed that the NHANES data may also be used for further research on co-exposure to multiple chemicals in the U.S. population (Qian et al 2015; Sobus et al 2015; Woodruff et al 2011). The objective of this investigation was to examine co-exposure to multiple metals and their species in the NHANES population to provide background data for future studies of potential metal interactions.…”

Co-exposure to non-persistent organic chemicals among American pre-school aged children: A pilot study

“…General population human biomonitoring programs are particularly useful for investigating such exposures (CDC 2015; Haines and Murray, 2012; Schulz et al, 2007). Interestingly, many contemporary chemicals are not persistent in people, and exposure biomarkers in urine are increasingly used to evaluate exposures to these compounds and to inform chemical risk assessments (Sobus et al, 2015). Compared to blood and other matrices, collecting urine is generally considered a non-invasive and relatively easy procedure, at least for adults.…”

Use of Dried Blood Spots for Estimating Children?s Exposures to Heavy Metals in Epidemiological Research

“…The combined use of biomarkers of exposure and biomarkers of effect has also become a central theme for linking the external environment to potential adverse health outcomes [6][7][8]. There are now large databases such as the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the German Environmental Survey (Ger ES), The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), and the Canadian Health Measures Study (CHMS) that are making such data mining readily available to the research community [9][10][11][12]. These are based on detailed analyses of thousands of "snapshot" measures from stratified random selections of subjects from the general populations of the respective countries.…”