2012
DOI: 10.1890/11-1930.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling

Abstract: Abstract. Bioclimatic envelope models use associations between aspects of climate and species' occurrences to estimate the conditions that are suitable to maintain viable populations. Once bioclimatic envelopes are characterized, they can be applied to a variety of questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. However, some have questioned the usefulness of these models, because they may be based on implausible assumptions or may be contradicted by empirical evidence. We review these areas of contention, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
810
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 895 publications
(830 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
6
810
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…''Fill'' refers to the total fit of the matrix. Columns ''NODFcolumns'' and ''NODFrows'' refer to the NODF as measured only according to matrix columns and rows, respectively, while ''NODF'' refers to the total NODF variables, but a minimum set of available parameters have been chosen to avoid overfitting, which in turn may result in artifacts (Beaumont et al 2005;Heikkinen et al 2006;Araújo and Peterson 2012). The fact that the total contribution of the direct abiotic variables (i.e., soil, landscape and climate variables) in the model reaches 10.8 %, whereas bare soil and plant cover attain 14.1 and 0.1 %, respectively, also indicates that patterns resulting from disturbance and biotic interactions may also be important.…”
Section: Probability Of Occurrence and Biotic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Fill'' refers to the total fit of the matrix. Columns ''NODFcolumns'' and ''NODFrows'' refer to the NODF as measured only according to matrix columns and rows, respectively, while ''NODF'' refers to the total NODF variables, but a minimum set of available parameters have been chosen to avoid overfitting, which in turn may result in artifacts (Beaumont et al 2005;Heikkinen et al 2006;Araújo and Peterson 2012). The fact that the total contribution of the direct abiotic variables (i.e., soil, landscape and climate variables) in the model reaches 10.8 %, whereas bare soil and plant cover attain 14.1 and 0.1 %, respectively, also indicates that patterns resulting from disturbance and biotic interactions may also be important.…”
Section: Probability Of Occurrence and Biotic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest trees are genetically adapted to a range of climate conditions [1], referred to as their climate niche [2,3] or bioclimatic envelope [4]. A rapidly changing climate is moving these climate niches away from their current species ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some process-based models can successfully integrate dispersal and metapopulation dynamics into forecasts of species geographic ranges (Anderson et al, 2009;Fordham et al, 2013), most of the currently available models are too complex in parameterization and validation in model application (Pearson and Dawson, 2003). The bioclimatic envelope models have various limitations (such as the assumption of equilibrium, the assumption of complete sampling of species niche, and insufficient inclusion of adaptation, evolution, and dispersal), they are still used by many researchers (Hannah et al, 2002;Huntley et al, 2010;Araújo and Peterson, 2012). With a good understanding of the modelling techniques, careful choice of explanatory variables, and appropriate model validation and testing, these models can still provide important information on the potential impact of climate change on species range shifts, and help inform conservation decisions in a changing climate (Hijmans and Graham, 2006;Araújo and Peterson, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%