1998
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uses and limits of empirical data in measuring and modeling human lead exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the lack of measurement data in the village for tapwater and lead bioavailability, which is usually recognized as a determining factor for estimating blood lead level (Mushak 1998), should not represent a major fault. For drinking water, the analysis of observed data showed that there is no significant difference between blood lead level of children drinking tapwater and those drinking bottled water.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Comparison Between Predicted Data And Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the lack of measurement data in the village for tapwater and lead bioavailability, which is usually recognized as a determining factor for estimating blood lead level (Mushak 1998), should not represent a major fault. For drinking water, the analysis of observed data showed that there is no significant difference between blood lead level of children drinking tapwater and those drinking bottled water.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Comparison Between Predicted Data And Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle size is also a relevant parameter in exposure assessments. Smaller size fractions (< 100 mm) tend to adhere to a child's hand and are thus more likely to be ingested; once ingested, these tend to have a higher bioavailability than larger particles (Barltrop and Meek, 1979;Duggan and Inskip, 1985;Davies et al, 1990;Mushak, 1998;Gulson et al, 1995;Paustenbach et al, 1997 and references cited therein). With respect to the inhalation pathway, particle size is a key parameter: the smaller the aerodynamic diameter, the more likely that a particle will be re-suspended and available for inhalation during cleaning activities.…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies in the U.K. found that 50% of the daily Pb intake of 2-year-old urban children occurs by ingestion of house dust through normal, hand-to-mouth activities (Thornton et al, 1994). Such findings triggered a large research effort into residential exposures to Pb, advantages and disadvantages of various indoor sampling approaches, and abatement technologies (see Lanphear et al, 1998;Adgate et al, 1998;Sutton et al, 1995;Mushak, 1998 and references cited therein), and application of stable Pb isotope analysis for identification of sources and exposure pathways (Gulson et al, 1994;Gulson et al, 1995;Rabinowitz, 1995;Maddaloni et al, 1998;Manton et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiologically based kinetic models (PBKM) representing the skeletal uptake, retention, and clearance of Pb in humans have long been in use and are important to define guidelines for prevention in occupational and environmental exposure to Pb. These models were developed before large epidemiological data sets including bone Pb were available and are limited to the data they are based on, which only in a few cases were collected in humans [2]. In particular, two widely used models, namely the Leggett and O'Flaherty models [3,4], were shown not to fit well epidemiological data from surveys of occupationally exposed populations, and require significant adjustments in their default transfer rates before some consistency between the observed and predicted bone Pb concentrations can be achieved [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%