1978
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4302.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uses and Abuses of the ITPA

Abstract: In the February 1978 issue, the article by Samuel A. Kirk and Winifred D. Kirk, “Uses and Abuses of the ITPA,” contains an error. The description in the legend of Figure 1 should read, “Profile A, A case of chromosomal translocation classified as trainable mentally retarded but should be classified as a child with a learning disability; Profile B, A case of general mental retardation.”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities' CITPA) Grammatic Closure subtest has been correlated to academic achievement in the areas of reading, mathematics and spelling as demonstrated in the reviews of numerous studies (Sedlack and Weener, 1973;Kirk and Elkins, 1974;Newcomer and Hammill, 1975;Kirk and Kirk, 1978 Criticisms of the ITPA In addition to Kirk and Kirk's objections to its misuse, criticisms of the ITPA centered around analyses determining the construct validity and the internal structure of the test's battery of subtests (Carroll, 1972;Hare, Hammill and Bartel, 1973;Cronkhite and Penner, 1975). Sedlack and Weener (1973) reviewed twenty factor analysis studies on the ITPA and stated "the most striking feature of all the factor analytic work done on the ITPA is its inconsistency."…”
Section: The Grammatic Closure Subtest Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities' CITPA) Grammatic Closure subtest has been correlated to academic achievement in the areas of reading, mathematics and spelling as demonstrated in the reviews of numerous studies (Sedlack and Weener, 1973;Kirk and Elkins, 1974;Newcomer and Hammill, 1975;Kirk and Kirk, 1978 Criticisms of the ITPA In addition to Kirk and Kirk's objections to its misuse, criticisms of the ITPA centered around analyses determining the construct validity and the internal structure of the test's battery of subtests (Carroll, 1972;Hare, Hammill and Bartel, 1973;Cronkhite and Penner, 1975). Sedlack and Weener (1973) reviewed twenty factor analysis studies on the ITPA and stated "the most striking feature of all the factor analytic work done on the ITPA is its inconsistency."…”
Section: The Grammatic Closure Subtest Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• " (Kirk and Kirk, 1978). As proposed by Kirk and Kirk, construct validity of the Grammatic Closure subtest was not supported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations