Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Empowering People - CHI '90 1990
DOI: 10.1145/97243.97271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons

Abstract: It is impossible to design systems which are appropriate for all users and ail situations.We believe that a useful technique is to have end users tailor their systems to match their personal work practices. This requires not only systems which can be tailored, but a culture within which users feel in control of the system and in which tailoring is the norm. In a two-pronged research project we have worked closely with a group of users to develop a system to support tailoring and to help the users evolve a "tai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
168
0
5

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
168
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus on mutual adaptation suggests, however, the mTAC is particularly well suited to approaches that address the emergent nature of requirements, such as prototyping and agile systems development (Hall 2001;Surendra 2008). The tendency for people to adapt technologies to suit their needs also suggests that technologies should be designed for appropriation by making them more tailorable, malleable and flexible in order to better support technology adaptation (Carroll 2004;Hevner et al 2004;MacLean et al 1990). Furthermore, the insights gained from reflecting on the process of appropriation for a particular user cohort and use context can potentially guide changes to contextual influences, leading to appropriation behaviours that are more productive and persistent.…”
Section: The Technology Appropriation Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus on mutual adaptation suggests, however, the mTAC is particularly well suited to approaches that address the emergent nature of requirements, such as prototyping and agile systems development (Hall 2001;Surendra 2008). The tendency for people to adapt technologies to suit their needs also suggests that technologies should be designed for appropriation by making them more tailorable, malleable and flexible in order to better support technology adaptation (Carroll 2004;Hevner et al 2004;MacLean et al 1990). Furthermore, the insights gained from reflecting on the process of appropriation for a particular user cohort and use context can potentially guide changes to contextual influences, leading to appropriation behaviours that are more productive and persistent.…”
Section: The Technology Appropriation Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the insights gained from reflecting on the process of appropriation for a particular user cohort and use context can potentially guide changes to contextual influences, leading to appropriation behaviours that are more productive and persistent. Such changes might include improving competence in using the technology, developing a tailoring culture to better exploit the functionality offered or providing continuing access to training to encourage more productive use (Fidock 2004;MacLean et al 1990;Mendoza et al 2005).…”
Section: The Technology Appropriation Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LearnabilityT he degree to which the EUD system supports the learning effort of end-users; support of "gentle slope" [MCLM90] as a concept to empower users with different skill levels.…”
Section: Eud Attribute Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environment for the definition of the language, on the other hand, is typically the realm of the 'application designer' or, in our framework, of actors who define languages needed by a particular community of end-users for defining their coordination mechanisms. The flexible and adaptable visibility and accessibility of the three environments, while preserving their specific context and functionality, is the basis of what has been proposed as an incremental approach to customization (MacLean et al, 1990). Then, in Ariadne the distinction between user and designer is very smooth as it depends, dynamically, on the assignment of roles to an actor and on the role the latter is currently playing.…”
Section: A Differentiated Visibility During the C 2 M Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%