2007
DOI: 10.1177/0961000607080417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User satisfaction as a measure of system performance

Abstract: It is evident from previous research that user satisfaction is a multidimensional, subjective variable which can be affected by many factors other than performance of the system or searcher. This article draws on information retrieval and information systems literature in an attempt to understand what user satisfaction is, how it is measured, what factors affect it, and why findings on user satisfaction have been so varied and contradictory. It concludes with recommendations for future investigation of the use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies report high levels of patient satisfaction [13,14]. But there is often little consistency in the methodologies that are used to evaluate telemedicine satisfaction and the aspects of satisfaction explored [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies report high levels of patient satisfaction [13,14]. But there is often little consistency in the methodologies that are used to evaluate telemedicine satisfaction and the aspects of satisfaction explored [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of satisfaction makes it a difficult construct to define [14]. Satisfaction has historically been used as a means of measuring IS effectiveness and success [27,28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In assessing users' satisfaction with libraries, Tessier et al (1977) included factors such as the output, the library as a whole, its policies as well as the interaction with the library staff. Other factors commonly used in studies include completeness of search results (Su, 1992(Su, , 1998; interface style (Crawford et al, 1992;Hildreth, 2001;Manning et al, 2008); interaction with the system (Crawford et al, 1992;Griffiths et al, 2007;Manning et al, 2008); response time (Kelly, 2009); features and functionality of the system (Griffiths et al, 2007); ease of query formulation (Loupy and Bellot, 1997) and ease of use (Hildreth, 2001). Cooper (1973a); Saracevic et al (1988) and Draper (1996) argued that satisfaction is the ultimate measure to evaluate IR systems.…”
Section: User Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It have been an indicator to evaluate the satisfaction level of the user towards the IS system (Griffiths et al, 2007) and as an indicator for system success (Wang and Liao, 2007). It is also related to the user experience when using the IS system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%