User perceptions of urine diversion dehydration toilets: Experiences from a cross-sectional study in eThekwini Municipality

Abstract

The current environmental challenges that most middle-and low-income countries have been experiencing has led to new environmentally sustainable and economically viable sanitation solutions, such as waterless systems with source separation of human waste. We conducted a cross-sectional study in eThekwini municipality to explore the post-implementation challenges of urine diversion dehydration toilets (UDDTs) after a decade of installation and the adaptive processes necessary to increase the sustained use of the toilets. A structured questionnaire was administered to 17 499 households in 65 rural and per-urban areas of eThekwini using mobile phone technology. Results report low levels of satisfaction with the facilities as well as an association between perceived smell in the toilets and malfunctioning of the pedestal, and low use of UDDTs when a pit latrine is present in the dwelling perimeter. Conclusions relate to the importance of educational and promotional activities that stress the economic return derived from reusing urine and excreta in agricultural activities.

Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Eco-Toilet Systems in Rural Areas: A Case Study in the Philippines

“…Those who believe that feces can be used as safe fertilizer have higher demands of sanitation solution. Roma et al [41] believed that raising the awareness on nutrient value of human urine and feces would promote the acceptance of the ETS. Table 12 shows the comparison of responses in terms respondents willingness to utilize human feces and urine as fertilizer.…”

The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer on Toilet Use in eThekwini, South Africa

“…Though previous work has indicated low levels of acceptance [33], we find that cash incentives are sufficient to overcome any issues that may exist with regard to UDDT use and urine transport.…”

“…However, the separation at the user interface is not perfect and the user must "aim" in order to get the urine in the front to keep the faeces chambers dry and prevent clogging in the urine pipe; the seat is especially difficult for children to use. Though households did not have to pay for the installation, and do not need to pay for water (to make them work), evidence suggests that acceptance and use rates are low [33].…”

Have Five Decades of Development Engineering Research Improved Sanitation in Southern Africa?

“…However, there has been growing opposition from residents; a survey found that 70 per cent of households with UDDT were dissatisfied with them, 27 per cent complaining of smell and many who preferred to use traditional pit toilets. Within a few years, 10 per cent of users had converted their UDDTs to flush toilets, often discharging to poorly constructed French drains (Roma et al ., ).…”