User perception of a new hydrophilic‐coated male urinary catheter for intermittent use

Koeter, Ingrid; Stensrød, Gro Cecilia; Nilsen, Aud Hunsbedt; Lund, Rigmor Løkken; Haslam, Collette; Sèze, M. de; Rajagopalan, Sriram; Heesakkers, John

doi:10.1002/nop2.193

Cited by 6 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is noteworthy that many (n = 47) had already used a catheter before, and only three were new to CIC treatment. The study by Koeter et al 13 also analyzed the perception of and adherence to the procedure and, although with a different instrument, pointed out results similar to those of this study, when detecting that individuals were satisfied with the ease of insertion and reduction of urethral trauma, and these participants already used some hydrophilic catheter.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

“…The results show that convenience, ease of use and hygienic factors are the patient's preferred features for a urinary catheter. These factors were confirmed for the evaluated hydrophilic-coated catheter 13 .…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 65%

“…In the fourth study, Koeter et al 13 sought to evaluate user perception with polyolefin elastomer catheter in comparison to the catheter in use. A total of 365 patients participated in all phases of the study, and the new catheter tested was evaluated with an overall satisfaction rating of 81% (N = 289/359), and 72% continued to use it.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analysis of Patient’s Satisfaction With Clean Intermittent Urethral Catheterization

Greghi

Azevedo

Rodrigues

2022

ESTIMA, Braz. J. Enterostomal Ther.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To compare and evaluate the aspects of the use of two bladder catheters for the person undergoing treatment with post-void residual, in clean intermittent bladder catheterization (CIL). Method: Quantitative, observational, and descriptive analysis developed in a reference outpatient clinic, for 48 municipalities, from September to November 2020. Fifty patients with post-void residual, who underwent CVIL, took part in the study. Their average age was 44,8 years old, and 72% of them were male. Two lubricated catheters were compared, from different technologies, both with attached bags, for seven days, six catheterizations a day, using a validated instrument of perception of customer satisfaction. Data were analyzed by the software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics 23.0, and for the comparison of the two catheters it was used the Wilcoxon’s non-parametric test. Results: The polyvinyl chloride (PVC) catheter pre-lubricated with glycerol reached greaterparticipant satisfaction in the evaluated attributes (90 versus 86%) in relation to the hydrophilic polyurethane (PVP) pre-lubricated catheter, although there was no statistical significance on the partial or total scores of the instrument used. Conclusion: The study allowed the comparison of two catheters, and the evaluation of the general score for both was positive. Some negative evaluation for certain attributes is possible to be improved. This kind of study is able to discriminate the catheters, and it can be reproduced.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 65%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Patient’s Satisfaction With Clean Intermittent Urethral Catheterization

Greghi

Azevedo

Rodrigues

2022

ESTIMA, Braz. J. Enterostomal Ther.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No 12 ; Estudo IV: Koeter et al 13 ; 1: cateter hidrofílico de poliuretano pré-lubrificado com bolsa acoplada; 2: cateter de policloreto de vinila com bolsa acoplada; 3: cateter de elastômeros de poliolefinas; 4: cateter de policloreto de vinila convencional Fonte: elaboração própria.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Análise Da Satisfação Do Paciente Com O Cateterismo Vesical Intermitente Limpo

Greghi

Azevedo

Rodrigues

2022

ESTIMA, Braz. J. Enterostomal Ther.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivos:Comparar e avaliar os atributos de dois cateteres vesicais para pessoa em tratamento com resíduo pós-miccional, no cateterismo intermitente limpo (CIL). Método: Estudo quantitativo, observacional e descritivo desenvolvido em ambulatório de referência para 48 municípios, entre setembro e novembro de 2020. Participaram 50 pacientes com resíduo pós-miccional que realizam CIL, com 44,8 anos de idade média, sendo 72% homens. Foram comparados dois cateteres lubrificados, de diferentes tecnologias, ambos com bolsa acoplada, por sete dias, na frequência de seis cateterismos diários, utilizando instrumento validado de percepção da satisfação do cliente. Os dados foram analisados por meio do software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics 23.0, e para comparação dos cateteres foi usado o teste não paramétrico de Wilcoxon. Resultados: O cateter de policloreto de vinila (PVC) pré-lubrificado com glicerol alcançou maior satisfação entre os participantes nos atributos avaliados (90% versus 86%) em relação ao cateter hidrofílico de poliuretano (PVP) pré-lubrificado, embora sem significância estatística nos escores parciais e totais do instrumento utilizado. Conclusão: O estudo possibilitou comparar os dois cateteres, e a avaliação do escore geral para ambos foi positiva. Algumas avaliações negativas para determinados atributos são passíveis de melhorias, além de ser esse modelo de estudo capaz de discriminar os cateteres, podendo ser reproduzido.

show abstract

“…33 Studies are still divided as to whether HPCs are easier or more difficult to handle. 34,35 We hypothesized that individuals with tetraplegia would experience difficulties in handling HPCs due to impaired hand function compared to individuals with paraplegia. While both groups spent a similar time to prepare HPCs (16 vs 15 seconds), individuals with tetraplegia needed significantly more time (67 vs. 21 seconds, p=0.003) to prepare (i.e., unpack and lubricate) non-HPCs, than those with paraplegia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over study

Gopalakrishnan

Nielsen

Ramirez

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic (non-HPC) catheters. Currently, there is no evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC with either catheter. Objective: To compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction. Design, setting and participants: Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI at any spinal segment were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined IC protocol (e.g., enter bathroom, wash hands, transfer to toilet, etc.). Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale (i.e., strongly agree=5, strongly disagree=1). Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Time (i.e., for each step and in total) to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared between catheters using non-parametric statistics, i.e., Wilcoxon rank sign tests. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Results and limitations: Participants using HPCs spent less time to prepare a catheter [15 s (10-20) vs. 41 (20-69), p=0.002] and overall to perform IC [283 s (242-352) vs. 373 (249-441), p=0.01] compared to non-HPCs. Moreover, participants rated the preparation of HPCs to be easier [5 (4-5) vs. 4 (2-4), p=0.047] compared to non-HPCs. The key limitation of this pilot study was the sample size. Conclusions: Preparation and usage of HPCs for IC is easier and faster compared to non-HPCs. IC can be a significant temporal burden for SCI individuals. Patient summary: We compared coated and uncoated catheters on time needed for intermittent catheterization and user satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants can manually empty their bladder quicker and easier with coated compared to uncoated catheters.

show abstract

User perception of a new hydrophilic‐coated male urinary catheter for intermittent use

Cited by 6 publications

References 48 publications

Analysis of Patient’s Satisfaction With Clean Intermittent Urethral Catheterization

Analysis of Patient’s Satisfaction With Clean Intermittent Urethral Catheterization

Análise Da Satisfação Do Paciente Com O Cateterismo Vesical Intermitente Limpo

Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About