User Models in Dialog Systems 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83230-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User Models in Dialog Systems

Abstract: This chapter surveys the field of user modeling in artificial intelligence dialog systems. First, reasons why user modeling has become so important in the last few years are pointed out, and definitions are proposed for the terms 'user model' and 'user modeling component'. Research within and outside of artificial intelligence which is related to user modeling in dialog systems is discussed. In Section 2, techniques for constructing user models in the course of a dialog are presented and, in Section 3, recent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These channels capture 226 the idea of shared knowledge about problem domains, communication processes, 227 and agents involved with communicating parties. This notion is very close to the 228 goals of user modeling (Wahlster and Kobsa, 1989). Several researchers worked on 229 the incorporation of user modeling in order to improve the collaborative nature 230 of human-computer systems (for examples see Fischer, 2001).…”
Section: Non-graphical User Interfaces 153mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These channels capture 226 the idea of shared knowledge about problem domains, communication processes, 227 and agents involved with communicating parties. This notion is very close to the 228 goals of user modeling (Wahlster and Kobsa, 1989). Several researchers worked on 229 the incorporation of user modeling in order to improve the collaborative nature 230 of human-computer systems (for examples see Fischer, 2001).…”
Section: Non-graphical User Interfaces 153mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian networks to formal knowledge models as known in symbolic artificial 274 intelligence (Wahlster and Kobsa, 1989 In the area of user interaction this provides us with a clear formalism to connect 294 knowledge about the user, environment, and user aims. 295 An obstacle in connecting and sharing data, is that often the knowledge cap-296 tured within an application is at too low a level of abstraction; it is too domain 297 specific.…”
Section: Semantic Technologies 271mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem that arises because of the wide variety of users of such tools is to find a way for adapting the presentation to the particular user. Many of the most advanced solutions [20,18,1,9,10] start from the assumption that adaptation should focus on the user's own characteristics, thus, though in different ways, they all try to associate him/her with a reference prototype (also known as the "user model"); the presentation is then adapted to user prototypes. The association between the user and a model is done either a priori, by asking the user to fill a form, or little by little by inducing preferences and interests from the user's choices.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of efforts to incorporate models of users into knowledge-based systems (Rich, 1983;Clancey, 1986;Kass and Finin, 1987;Fain-Lehman and Carbonell, 1987;Reiser, Anderson and Farrell, 1985;Wahlster and Kobsa, 1988;VanLehn, 1988). In our own User 1 User 2 Figure 11.…”
Section: M3: the Systems' Models Of Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%