1997 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/asru.1997.658991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User modeling for spoken dialogue system evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations can be run for different groups of users, as was previously done by Eckert et al (1997). These authors define four very distinct user groups with extreme behavior patterns (e.g.…”
Section: User Group Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulations can be run for different groups of users, as was previously done by Eckert et al (1997). These authors define four very distinct user groups with extreme behavior patterns (e.g.…”
Section: User Group Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this could be done with real user tests, they claim that cheaper, quicker, and more objective methods are needed especially during the early development states. In the same year, Eckert et al (1997) proposed a statistical approach to model the interaction between users and a spoken dialog system. In their model, user and system actions are modeled on the intentional level, and user actions are dependent on the previous system action and the current user state.…”
Section: User Simulation For Spoken Dialog Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [48], Eckert, Levin and Pieraccini introduced the use of statistical models to predict the next user action by means of a n-gram model. The proposed model has the advantage of being both statistical and task-independent.…”
Section: Modeling the User Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Eckert et al, 1997(Eckert et al, , 1998, Eckert, Levin and Pieraccini introduced the use of statistical models to predict the next user action by means of a ngram model. The proposed model has the advantage of being both statistical and task-independent.…”
Section: Related Work Evaluation Of Dialog Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different methodologies are described to select the next user action given a history of information states. The first method uses n-grams (Eckert et al, 1997), but with values of n from 2 to 5 to consider a longer history of the dialog. The best results are obtained with 4-grams.…”
Section: Related Work Evaluation Of Dialog Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%