2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.839769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User Involvement in Myasthenia Gravis Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the members had complementary expertise and included patient representatives, we abstained from formal voting processes but instead obtained consensus through open discussions. The two patient representatives gave input on all aspects of the work, and particularly when deciding topics where MG‐specific treatment guidance was most needed [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the members had complementary expertise and included patient representatives, we abstained from formal voting processes but instead obtained consensus through open discussions. The two patient representatives gave input on all aspects of the work, and particularly when deciding topics where MG‐specific treatment guidance was most needed [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%