User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research

Montgomery, Kevin; Stephanides, Michael; Schendel, Stephen A.; Ross, Muriel D.

doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.014

Cited by 22 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Case studies reported by Montgomery et al (2005) suggest that being able to make eye contact is essential in social situations (such as preoperative planning, or surgical practice), restricting the use of specialized headgear to specific, single-user scenarios. At the moment of writing, autostereoptic monitors are becoming available, but do not yet offer the specifications necessary for serious use in a professional setting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning

Luursema

Verwey

Kommers

et al. 2008

Interacting with Computers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning

Luursema

Verwey

Kommers

et al. 2008

Interacting with Computers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The difficulty with many of these techniques is that in the context of medical imaging, some of the input mechanisms may be obtrusive (e.g. virtual reality and its associated hardware) or require additional training to be properly utilized [7]. These are all impediments to the medical imaging domain, as imaging specialists interpret information rapidly and need to focus on diagnosis tasks, instead of figuring out an interface or input mechanism.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Poster: Exploring 3D volumetric medical data using mobile devices

Seyed

Rodrigues

Maurer

et al. 2014

2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medical imaging specialists have traditionally used keyboard and mouse based techniques and interfaces for examining both 2D and 3D medical images, but with newer imaging technologies resulting in significantly larger volumes of 3D medical images, these techniques that have become increasingly cumbersome for imaging specialists. To replace traditional techniques, using mobile devices present an effective means for navigating and exploring complex 3D medical data sets, as they provide increased fluidity and flexibility, leveraging people's existing skills with tangible objects. 3D interactions using mobile devices may provide benefit for imaging specialists, but little is known about using these interactions in the medical imaging domain. In this paper, we explore the design of 3D interaction techniques using mobile devices and preliminary feedback from imaging specialists suggests that these interactions may be a viable solution for the medical imaging domain.

show abstract

“…22,23 This problem was realized as far back as 1983 by Marsh and Vannier. 24 Research between NASA Ames and Stanford during the 1990s created and perfected a three-dimensional virtual-reality visualization system that was patient specific and Web based. 25 The importance of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning increases with the complexity of the deformity and reconstruction needed to correct it.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%