2012
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1110.0690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-Generated Open Source Products: Founder's Social Capital and Time to Product Release

Abstract: glilien@psu.edu} V olunteer users employ collaborative Internet technologies to develop open source products, a form of usergenerated content, where time to product release is a crucial measure of project success. The open source community features two separate but related subcommunities: developer users who contribute time and effort to develop products and end users who act as collaborative testers and provide feedback. We develop hypotheses concerning how the location of the project's founders in the social… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these studies, which dealt with tangible goods, the interest in research in user innovation was dramatically heightened by a focus on information goods that became more widespread through the Internet (Franke & von Hippel, 2003;Ichikohji & Katsumata, 2014, 2016a, 2016bJeppesen, 2005;Lakhani & von Hippel, 2003;Lerner & Tirole, 2002). In recent years, some studies have even focused on the relationship between usage and creation (Ghose & Han, 2011;Ichikohji & Katsumata, 2016a;Mallapragada, Grewal, & Lilien, 2012). However, these did not take into account any hardware aspects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these studies, which dealt with tangible goods, the interest in research in user innovation was dramatically heightened by a focus on information goods that became more widespread through the Internet (Franke & von Hippel, 2003;Ichikohji & Katsumata, 2014, 2016a, 2016bJeppesen, 2005;Lakhani & von Hippel, 2003;Lerner & Tirole, 2002). In recent years, some studies have even focused on the relationship between usage and creation (Ghose & Han, 2011;Ichikohji & Katsumata, 2016a;Mallapragada, Grewal, & Lilien, 2012). However, these did not take into account any hardware aspects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, internet users have become one of the main topics of innovation research (Fujita & Ikuine, 2013;Ghose & Han, 2011;Lerner & Tirole, 2002;Mallapragada, Grewal, & Lilien, 2012;Nojima, 2004). Research on innovation management about internet users has broadly focused on two main issues: attributes of innovating users and factors encouraging user innovation (Ichikohji, 2010).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chapter discussed some of those key problems starting with the proliferation of volunteer and user-generated content (Mallapragada et al, 2012), which despite being a solution to existing distribution problems, poses significant quality concerns (Ingawale et al, 2013). Several studies indicate that quality plays a major role in the sustainability of an OER project (Clements & Pawlowski, 2012;Cechinel et al, Tate & Hoshek, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wikipedia is perhaps one of the largest and most famous examples of a database with all of its content created by users, although the accuracy of its content is largely contested (Ingawale et al, 2013). A number of companies have enabled open source to encourage users to share information about products, brands and core competencies (Di Benedetto, 2014;Pitt, et al, 2006;Mallapragada et al, 2012). While several websites like Reddit and 9Gag as well as social networking mediums such as Twitter feeds have allowed users to create and share content, it is argued that the creation of educational content by members of the public is still premature (Mallapragada et al, 2012;Noguti, 2016;Douglas, 2014).…”
Section: Anything That Is Free May Not Have a Value (Kumar) The Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation