Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1868914.1868973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User experience evaluation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
80
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the literature provides plenty of UX evaluation methods, few can be adopted to evaluate projects in their early stages,and there is a lack of effective multimethod approaches (Vermeeren et al 2010). The palette thins further when focusing on multimodal interfaces (Bargas-Avila & Hornbaek 2011; Wechsung 2014).…”
Section: User Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the literature provides plenty of UX evaluation methods, few can be adopted to evaluate projects in their early stages,and there is a lack of effective multimethod approaches (Vermeeren et al 2010). The palette thins further when focusing on multimodal interfaces (Bargas-Avila & Hornbaek 2011; Wechsung 2014).…”
Section: User Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vermeeren et al, 2010). It is envisaged that taxonomies of UX qualities, which can facilitate the selection of UX methods and measures, will come to fruition from these ongoing endeavours.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have conducted studies on user experience and satisfaction [1,4,6,7,15,16,17]. In particular, Chen and Macredie [1] argue that the website meeting users' needs derives their enjoyment and increases value of purchase.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%