User-experience and patient satisfaction with quality of tuberculosis care in India: A mixed-methods literature review

Abstract

BackgroundTuberculosis affected 2.7 million people in India in 2017. The Revised National TB Control Programme has achieved milestones in coverage, however quality of TB care remains highly variable and often poor, with significant gaps in provider knowledge, practices, and patients consistently lost to follow-up. These quality gaps are largely informed by studies on provider practices or objective chart abstractions and case data. Per the knowledge of the author, no review has been conducted on first-hand patient perspectives on the quality of TB care they receive. This mixed-methods literature review aims to synthesize evidence on user-experience and patient satisfaction with TB care in India and inform areas for service quality improvement.MethodsFive medical databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health (Ovid), Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched for empirical studies on patient perspectives on TB health services published between January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2017. Studies in English with adult patients with any form of TB in the public or private health system were included. Studies prior to entering the health system, on distance to health facilities and cost were excluded. Seven Indian journals were hand searched and a grey literature search was conducted in GoogleScholar. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and thematic analysis was conducted by categorizing data using NVivo 12.ResultsA total of 498 studies were screened, of which 23 met the inclusion criteria. 16 supplementary studies were identified from Indian journals and grey literature. Of the 39 total studies included most were quantitative (29; 74%), based in South India (17; 44%) and focused on drug-sensitive TB patients (19; 49%) within the public health system (25; 64%). Data collection methods were highly heterogenous which limited synthesis and comparisons across population demographics, health sectors, or regions. Overall quantitative patient satisfaction measured in seven studies was high. Two major themes identified were provider-related factors (n = 26 studies) and convenience (n = 25), and six minor themes were supplies and equipment availability (n = 12), confidence (n = 10), information and communication (n = 10), waiting time (n = 8), stigma (n = 4), and confidentiality (n = 4). Each reported positive and negative user-experiences. Most significantly, DOTS did not fit the daily needs and obligations of many patients, particularly due to conflicts with employment and frequency of visits; while positive provider support, information, and flexibility helped patients adhere to treatment.ConclusionAlthough quantitative patient satisfaction was found to be high, data were not collected using robust, validated tools. Qualitative and quantitative user-experiences in each theme were variable, making them both barriers and facilitators of good quality TB care. Poor user-experiences were often responsible for patients interrupting treatment or dropping out of TB care. Patient-centeredness, or user-friendliness of TB ...

Acceptability of the Medication Event Reminder Monitor for Promoting Adherence to Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Therapy in Two Indian Cities: Qualitative Study of Patients and Health Care Providers

“…Successful adherence for diseases with a prolonged treatment course, such as MDR-TB, requires a high level of dosing implementation (ie, taking a medication dose on a given day) and persistence (ie, taking medications for the entire duration of therapy [ 3 ]). Factors contributing to nonadherence are complex and include therapy-related (eg, toxicities [ 4 ]), psychosocial (eg, alcohol use [ 5 ], depression [ 6 ], and stigma [ 7 ]), structural (eg, distance from clinics and medication costs [ 8 , 9 ]), and health system–related challenges (eg, poor user experience with the health system). Patients with MDR-TB face particularly high levels of drug toxicity [ 4 ] and psychosocial barriers, including depression, substance use disorders, stigma, and discrimination [ 10 ].…”

Prediagnostic loss to follow-up in an active case finding tuberculosis programme: a mixed-methods study from rural Bihar, India

“…32 33 The health system and health provider issues like cumbersome processes in health facilities and poor provider behaviour resonated in our findings. 34 These patient narratives add explanation to people's preference for private sector and informal providers even though affordable services are available in the PHS. People's trust in the provider is a crucial factor in determining their preferred provider, which was also corroborated by patients in our study.…”

Gaps and Interventions across the Diagnostic Care Cascade of TB Patients at the Level of Patient, Community and Health System: A Qualitative Review of the Literature

“…It is crucial to understand who is ‘missed,’ find this ‘missing’ population and provide quality care. To reach the ‘missing’ population, addressing quality of care and planning user-centric strategies is necessary [ 10 ]. Often, there is a significant delay in diagnosis.…”

“…Improving access to quality services, active case-finding strategies, and other approaches have been suggested to fill the gap in the care cascade for TB. Despite these strategies, innovations in equipment and treatment, and scale-up of TB care services, gaps in the cascade of care persist, and control over the disease is far from achieved [ 10 ]. Measures for new diagnostics, medications, and vaccines are improving, but slowly.…”