2016
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-customized brain computer interfaces using Bayesian optimization

Abstract: Unlike the best reported results in the literature, which are based on more sophisticated feature extraction and classification methods, and rely on prestudies to determine the hyper-parameter values, our method has the advantage of being fully automated, uses less sophisticated feature extraction and classification methods, and yields similar or superior results compared to the best performing designs in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assert the performances of our method, we compare with FBCSP, Riemannian geometry [4], Bayesian optimization [5], and ShallowNet [17]. Table 1 shows the results of the classification of our method and the baselines in terms of accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assert the performances of our method, we compare with FBCSP, Riemannian geometry [4], Bayesian optimization [5], and ShallowNet [17]. Table 1 shows the results of the classification of our method and the baselines in terms of accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM-FBCSP is an improved version of FBCSP, which recommended the Hilbert transform to extract the envelope of the signal, and then chose SVM to classify the features [ 42 ]. BO is a method to optimize hyperparameters which used Bayesian optimization on the basis of extracting CSP features [ 43 ]. Compared with the three algorithms, for the seventh subject, the classification accuracy of the SVM-FBCSP is better than our method, but the average accuracy of our algorithm is 10.7574% higher than FBCSP, 10.3774% higher than BO, and 7.3274% higher than SVM-FBCSP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When subject-specific maximized performance is desired, these time intervals could be determined automatically (see e.g. Bashashati et al 2016). As expected, the standard deviation is clearly reduced in the baseline interval.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 94%