Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03176-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User, Context and Device Modeling for Adaptive User Interface Systems

Abstract: Abstract. Personalization and self-customizable environments tend to increase user satisfaction. There are many approaches to face the problem of designing adaptive user interface systems. However, most of the reviewed solutions are very domain dependent. We identify users, context and devices as the most significant entities in adaptive user interface domains. This paper digs into several drawback related to these environments, remarking the incongruity and aggregation of context, and the entities interaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Casas et al [30] proposed a user-modeling methodology based on personas, i.e., archetypical representations of real individuals that can help designers in being aware of the information that can impact on the design of an AAL or AmI system; this approach has proven to be useful also when it comes to modeling ontologies that take into account inhabitants [31]. To overcome the problem of a static definition of the users, Castillejo, et al [32] introduced the concept of dynamic capabilities, which takes into account a user, his/her specific needs, and the characteristics of the context in which he/she operates. In this regard, the SH needs to encompass also dwellers' data regarding their needs and health conditions, and ontologies can provide the means to formalize this non-static information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casas et al [30] proposed a user-modeling methodology based on personas, i.e., archetypical representations of real individuals that can help designers in being aware of the information that can impact on the design of an AAL or AmI system; this approach has proven to be useful also when it comes to modeling ontologies that take into account inhabitants [31]. To overcome the problem of a static definition of the users, Castillejo, et al [32] introduced the concept of dynamic capabilities, which takes into account a user, his/her specific needs, and the characteristics of the context in which he/she operates. In this regard, the SH needs to encompass also dwellers' data regarding their needs and health conditions, and ontologies can provide the means to formalize this non-static information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a bad conception induces more inconvenience for older drivers, whereas the system's role is to encourage mobility and security of the driver who uses it [6,7]. User tests allow to assess a system and to verify its credibility [8]. A previous study was made with older drivers to assess a new driving system during user tests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a number of environment context-models exist [4,6,15]. For our concrete adaptation purpose, we focus on those models, which focus mainly on the environmental factors in a physical manner.…”
Section: The Environment Context-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%