User choice and the changing notion of social citizenship in Swedish elderly care

Abstract

This article deals with the 2009 user choice reform in Swedish elderly care. It analyses how the tension between choice and older citizens' equal access to good quality care was dealt with by the policymakers who introduced it. Three overarching research questions are addressed in the analysis: (i) what role and responsibilities did the Swedish user choice reform assign to the users and how did the policymakers view users' ability to make an informed choice? (ii) How did the policymakers view the role and responsibilities of the local authorities and what tools were the local authorities given to ensure access to good quality elderly care for all citizens? (iii) Can the new user choice reform be said to contain a new notion of social citizenship for older people in Sweden? The findings suggest that while the user choice reform encouraged users to allocate resources and make free choices between providers, it also required users to become more responsible to ensure service quality. The reform also advocated that the local authorities should steer their elderly care sectors through partly new governance tools and secure quality foremost through the entering of contracts with authorized providers. The paper argues that, because of these required new roles and responsibilities, the Swedish user choice reform entails a more libertarian notion of social citizenship, requiring users to take on greater responsibility for their own well-being and protection against risks.

Cared and uncared populations: understanding unmet care needs of older adults (65+) across different social care systems in Europe

“…For instance, the results for Sweden and Poland may be explained by recent changes in care policies in these two countries. In the Swedish case, changes during the last three decades have been orientated towards enhancing voluntary choices and individuals’ involvement in their own care; however, these measures are taking place in a context where the second demographic transition may affect the availability of care provision by children and partners (Edlund and Lövgren 2022 ; Moberg 2021 ). Meanwhile, Poland’s history is characterized by an essential differentiation between hospice-palliative care, which emerged in the seventh decade of the last century, and home care (Krakowiak 2020 ), gaps between these two ways of care provision may reflect the lower quality of informal care provided in Poland when compared to the other countries (Dobrzyn-Matusiak et al 2014 ).…”

Abolishing the Act on System of Choice in Swedish eldercare: on arguments and replacements in the municipalities

“…Another argument is that privatizations challenge the universalistic and collective core of the Swedish welfare modelthat is, accessible, inclusive and equal social services of high quality (e.g., Vabø and Szebehely, 2012). A system of choice might instead contribute to increased inequality since citizens have different conditions to make informed choices and the services of the providers may vary (Moberg et al, 2016;Moberg, 2017Moberg, , 2023.…”

A critique of the marketisation of long-term residential and nursing home care

“…15 Individuals are free to choose between all authorised providers who meet the necessary requirements. 44 Authorised providers compete for individual customers. 44 The National Board of Health and Welfare was providing centralised information on clinical outcomes, staff training and turnover, and housing quality in their "Elderly Guide".…”

“…44 Authorised providers compete for individual customers. 44 The National Board of Health and Welfare was providing centralised information on clinical outcomes, staff training and turnover, and housing quality in their "Elderly Guide". 45 At the time of writing, this website was not in operation.…”