2003
DOI: 10.1108/01439910310457706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User‐adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee

Abstract: A magnetorheological knee prosthesis is presented that automatically adapts knee damping to the gait of the amputee using only local sensing of knee force, torque, and position. To assess the clinical effects of the user-adaptive knee prosthesis, kinematic gait data were collected on four unilateral trans-femoral amputees. Using the user-adaptive knee and a conventional, non-adaptive knee, gait kinematics were evaluated on both affected and unaffected sides. Results were compared to the kinematics of 12 age, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
193
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
193
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the recent developments in gait control for above-knee prosthesis are based on instrumented shoes coupled to the prosthesis, as reported by Bar et al (1983), Herr and Wilkenfeld (2003) and Kapti and Yucenur (2006). Compared to our approach, which is based on the echo control, when the load sensors are installed on the prosthesis foot, there are limitations for cyclic and symmetric patterns and the use for only unilateral amputees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the recent developments in gait control for above-knee prosthesis are based on instrumented shoes coupled to the prosthesis, as reported by Bar et al (1983), Herr and Wilkenfeld (2003) and Kapti and Yucenur (2006). Compared to our approach, which is based on the echo control, when the load sensors are installed on the prosthesis foot, there are limitations for cyclic and symmetric patterns and the use for only unilateral amputees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By utilizing specific programs and sensor information, these prostheses may result in a more natural gait (Aaron et al, 2006;Sup et al, 2008;Herr and Wilkenfeld, 2003;Johansson et al, 2005;Kahle et al, 2008;Kapti and Yucenur, 2006;Laferrier and Gailey, 2010). The main differences in the design of these prostheses are in their damping systems because an adequate damping allows for fast transitions in stride velocity, which increases the autonomy of the amputee.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• controlled by means of internal, intrinsically passive, actuators -These prostheses use external power to adapt their dynamics to different gait pattern. For example, in [2] and [3], the dynamical behavior of the prosthesis during walking relies on the control of a magnetorheological damper, which produces the required breaking torque for the knee joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,6 In most commercially available NMPKs early stance knee flexion is not possible. [7][8][9][10] Allowing early stance prosthetic knee flexion would require high knee damping. This high level of damping would restrict prosthetic knee flexion later on in the gait cycle when the knee has to be sufficiently flexed for forward progression of the swing leg.…”
Section: Non-microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Kneesmentioning
confidence: 99%