2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User adaptation to interactive advertising formats: The effect of previous exposure, habit and time urgency on ad skipping behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem lies in the paradoxical connection between the programs ratings before and after the ad unit [16]. In the multichannel environment, the ad skipping behaviors may result in lower ratings [17]. Restoration of the program rating after the ad unit depends on the decision to watch or skip the program; i.e., give preference to the programs broadcast by the concurrent channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem lies in the paradoxical connection between the programs ratings before and after the ad unit [16]. In the multichannel environment, the ad skipping behaviors may result in lower ratings [17]. Restoration of the program rating after the ad unit depends on the decision to watch or skip the program; i.e., give preference to the programs broadcast by the concurrent channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem lies in the paradoxical connection between the programs ratings before and after the ad unit [15]. In the multichannel environment, the ad skipping behaviors may result in the lower ratings [16]. Restoration of the program rating after the ad unit depends on the decision to watch or skip the program, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial block asked participants about their general perceptions and intentions towards the publisher website, using scales of perceived usefulness (from Bhattacherjee 2001), continuance intentions (Belanche et al 2014) and WOM intentions (Ryu et al 2012). The second block dealt with advertising effectiveness, and measured attitude toward the ad and direct questions of ad recall and brand recall to be assessed as a dummy right/wrong variable based on Belanche et al (2017aBelanche et al ( , 2017b. The third block consisted of measures about users' experience toward the ad and included scales of advertising intrusiveness (McCoy et al 2018), perceptions of goal impediment (Li and Huang 2016), intention to install an ad blocker (based on Shiller et al 2018), and their opinion about whether that kind of ad should "disappear", "be banned" and "forbidden" (own elaboration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of communication management could be described as irresponsible, and may damage the interrelation between consumers, publishers and advertisers (Ha and McCann 2008). Because an irresponsible use of communication sometimes results in dissatisfying experiences (Kitchen and Sheth 2016;Lim, Chock, and Golan 2018), consumers try to avoid intrusive ads by all means (Kelly, Kerr, Drennan 2010;Belanche, Flavián, and Pérez-Rueda 2017b). Despite such kind of catastrophic communication interaction, little has been done in the last decades to enhance the online advertising experience or at least mitigate the problems derived of a highly dissatisfying or annoying experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%