2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2020.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User activities and the heterogeneity of urban space: The case of Dahiyat Al Hussein park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cases of misalignment included disrupting relations (Law, 2002; Sharif, 2020, 2021; Yaneva, 2013), which disturbed sitting networks when the following occurred: The actual affordance of an object misaligns with the perceived one. This happened when users did not see a backed bench as affording comfort because its backrest was uncomfortable, or when users misalign with the affordance of privacy (edges) or interaction (grass) because of the continuous activity and children's play near them. Misalignment with one or more affordances despite alignment with another affordance within the same object.…”
Section: Discussion: Concepts Of Alignment Misalignment and Realignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cases of misalignment included disrupting relations (Law, 2002; Sharif, 2020, 2021; Yaneva, 2013), which disturbed sitting networks when the following occurred: The actual affordance of an object misaligns with the perceived one. This happened when users did not see a backed bench as affording comfort because its backrest was uncomfortable, or when users misalign with the affordance of privacy (edges) or interaction (grass) because of the continuous activity and children's play near them. Misalignment with one or more affordances despite alignment with another affordance within the same object.…”
Section: Discussion: Concepts Of Alignment Misalignment and Realignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases of realignment included examples where relations were adjusted and sitting networks were changed (Law, 2002; Sharif, 2020, 2021; Yaneva, 2013) through the following: Changing the meaning/workability of the same object affordance, where users deployed a bag to raise their feet or pillows to rest their backs for more comfort on backed benches. This also applied to users who sat behind a tree or used a pram to create a sense of boundary and achieve privacy while sitting on edges, or when users changed their position on grass to avoid children playing. Using one affordance to support another within the same object, where users used the perceived affordance of grass by changing position until they achieved another affordance: comfort.…”
Section: Discussion: Concepts Of Alignment Misalignment and Realignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the time when it was developed, the neighborhood emphasised communication, enhance socialisation, and relationships in between its residents, matters that are in line with today's social sustainability priorities. Being remotely located at the time, self-sufficiency was a key attribute, as the neighborhood was supported with inside and nearby facilities such as grocery stores, post office and day care (Sharif 2020).…”
Section: The Case Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a specific type of activity (e.g. playing, sitting, vending) recurs with a similar pattern, such as using the same objects and occupying similar times and locations, then the activity network is considered stabilised, albeit temporarily (Kim, 2017; Sharif, 2020a, b). Thus, an individual activity can be produced and stabilised through similarly or differently shaped networks.…”
Section: Actor-network Theory and The Temporality Of Urban Spacementioning
confidence: 99%