2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User action and facial expression recognition for error detection system in an ambient assisted environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a noninvasive and less costly instrument, FERS with AI-based algorithms also reduced the concerns of inter-and intrarater variation in the interview-based manually scored NPI [10,13]. The accuracy of the customized, video-based FERS was 86% in the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF) dataset; the results were comparable to those developed by histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) of facial feature extraction and other convolutional neural network (CNN) models (Table 6) [10,[21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As a noninvasive and less costly instrument, FERS with AI-based algorithms also reduced the concerns of inter-and intrarater variation in the interview-based manually scored NPI [10,13]. The accuracy of the customized, video-based FERS was 86% in the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF) dataset; the results were comparable to those developed by histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) of facial feature extraction and other convolutional neural network (CNN) models (Table 6) [10,[21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Lastly, the best fold accuracy is used to show the confusion matrix of the final results. The basic ELM parameters setup to test the performance for each feature extractions mentioned before is as: number of hidden neurons={2, 4,8,12,16,20,24,32, 64, 120}, activation function={Sigmoid, Cosine, Hyperbolic Tangent, Linear}. Figure 5(a) shows that basic ELM method is tested using FL, LBP and GLCM feature extractions with its best parameters which tested before.…”
Section: Experiments On Basic Elm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial expressions recognition is an important part of studying how humans react to the environment in the field of affective computing which aims to diagnose and measure someone's emotional expression explicitly and connect implicitly [3]. Facial expression recognition has been widely applied in several fields, including facial expression recognition for the detection of system errors in smart environments [4], enhancing the gaming experience [5], intelligent tutoring system [6], cooking experience [7], and so on. Those examples show that facial expressions play an important role in decision making, help the learning process, and also provide an assessment based on an action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these approaches are effective methods in extracting spatial information, they fail to capture morphological and contextual variations in the expression process. Recent methods aim to solve this problem by using massive datasets to obtain more efficient features of FER [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Some researchers use multimodal fusion to recognize emotions, such as voices, expressions, and actions [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%