Stents represent the default strategy in interventional cardiology (1). In the last decade, drug-eluting stents (DES) have been widely embraced because of their unprecedented ability to drastically inhibit neointimal proliferation. Accordingly, the clinical need for repeat revascularization has been significantly reduced despite the widespread use of coronary interventions in ever increasingly complex clinical and anatomic scenarios. However, the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) remains an issue of serious concern (2). DES have been unable to reduce the incidence of this complication but have changed its temporal pattern of presentation, widening the vulnerable period. Actually, this problem has prevented an even wider penetration of DES (1,2).
See page 131ST remains a very rare phenomenon, but it may be associated with devastating clinical consequences (2). Early series suggested that ST was associated with very high mortality (3). Subsequent studies-from less selected patient populations-suggested that the consequences of ST were not so dismal, although clinical outcomes were still poorer than those seen in de novo patients with acute myocardial infarction (4,5). The explanation for this particularly adverse prognosis remains obscure, but the uniquely large thrombus burden seen in patients with ST might play a role (2). Likewise, the underlying mechanisms leading to ST remain poorly elucidated but appear multifaceted. Mechanical factors, delayed endothelialization, and hypersensitivity reactions have all been considered as "local factors" able to generate a "vulnerable stent." Furthermore, from a "systemic" perspective, any potent stimulus triggering platelet activation might shift the delicate coagulation balance toward a prothrombotic milieu precipitating the acute event. However, despite intense research efforts, the incidence, predictive factors, underlying pathological substrate, clinical implications, and management of ST still remain incompletely elucidated. All previous studies on ST suffer from a common main limitation: relatively small sample sizes. Therefore, larger studies, with enough power to address the unmet need of information still required on this dreadful complication, are eagerly awaited.In this issue of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Armstrong et al. (6) present the results of an impressively large cohort of patients with ST (7,315 episodes of ST) included in the CathPCI Registry. This study provides unique insights that complement our current knowledge on ST. Present Study In the current study, 7,079 patients with ST (1,391 early [19.6%], 1,370 late [19.4%], and 4,318 very late [61%]), of 401,662 patients (1.8%) with acute coronary syndromes prospectively included in the CathPCI Registry, were analyzed (6). Two-thirds of patients received DES and experienced very late ST. Overall in-hospital mortality was only 4.5% and was similar for bare-metal stents (BMS) and DES ST. Patients with early ST showed a higher prevalence of black race, diabetes, and prior heart failure. They also presen...