Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S Ribosomal DNA-Based Bacterial Identification System for Identification of Clinically Significant Bacterial Isolates with Ambiguous Biochemical Profiles

Abstract

Due to the inadequate automation in the amplification and sequencing procedures, the use of 16S rRNA gene sequence-based methods in clinical microbiology laboratories is largely limited to identification of strains that are difficult to identify by phenotypic methods. In this study, using conventional full-sequence 16S rRNA gene sequencing as the "gold standard," we evaluated the usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA)-based bacterial identification system, which involves amplification and sequencing of the first 527-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA genes of bacterial strains and analysis of the sequences using the database of the system, for identification of clinically significant bacterial isolates with ambiguous biochemical profiles. Among 37 clinically significant bacterial strains that showed ambiguous biochemical profiles, representing 37 nonduplicating aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative, anaerobic, and Mycobacterium species, the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA-based bacterial identification system was successful in identifying 30 (81.1%) of them. Five (13.5%) isolates were misidentified at the genus level (Granulicatella adiacens was misidentified as Abiotrophia defectiva, Helcococcus kunzii was misidentified as Clostridium hastiforme, Olsenella uli was misidentified as Atopobium rimae, Leptotrichia buccalis was misidentified as Fusobacterium mortiferum, and Bergeyella zoohelcum was misidentified as Rimerella anatipestifer), and two (5.4%) were misidentified at the species level (Actinomyces odontolyticus was misidentified as Actinomyces meyeri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus was misidentified as Arcobacter butzleri). When the same 527-bp DNA sequences of these seven isolates were compared to the known 16S rRNA gene sequences in the GenBank, five yielded the correct identity, with good discrimination between the best and second best match sequences, meaning that the reason for misidentification in these five isolates was due to a lack of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of these bacteria in the database of the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA-based bacterial identification system. In conclusion, the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA-based bacterial identification system is useful for identification of most clinically important bacterial strains with ambiguous biochemical profiles, but the database of the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA-based bacterial identification system has to be expanded in order to encompass the rarely encountered bacterial species and achieve better accuracy in bacterial identification.Identification of bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories is traditionally performed by isolation of the organisms and study of their phenotypic characteristics, including Gram staining, morphology, culture requirements, and biochemical reactions. However, these methods of bacterial identification have major drawbacks. First, they cannot be used for noncultivable organisms. Second, we are occasionally faced with organisms exhibiting biochemical characteristics that do not fit into patterns of any known genus and species. Third,...

Bacteria with Probiotic Capabilities Isolated from the Digestive Tract of the Ornamental Fish Pterophyllum scalare

“…However, despite the certain inclusion of the three stains in the Bacillus genus, not a single one could be identified at the species level, due to variations that were found in their sequences with respect to the sequences of known species. This identification difficulty is in agreement with the results reported by Woo et al (2008), who explain that this variation can occur when isolating 16S rDNA because when two different bacterial species share almost all of their 16S rDNA sequence, this technique is not able to distinguish between the two; only the genus can be determined with certainty. These results imply that these could be previously unidentified species because there is no report of their isolation in samples from the digestive tract of fish.…”

Anaerospora hongkongensis Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov., a Novel Genus and Species with Ribosomal DNA Operon Heterogeneity Isolated from an Intravenous Drug Abuser with Pseudobacteremia

“…With the whole genome sequencing data of more than 100 bacteria and archaea available, it has been noted that there are relatively small interoperon heterogeneities for 16S rDNAs. In our experience in 16S rDNA sequencing, both for the known species and novel genera and species, direct sequencing of the PCR products has always been successful (16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)30). In this study, when we first amplified the 16S rDNA of HKU15 T and sequenced the PCR product directly, it was repeatedly observed that the 5' end of the PCR product could not be sequenced clearly, with the presence of multiple peaks.…”

Production of Poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid (PHB) by Bacillus cereus

“…In the World laboratories, it was shown that phylogenetic relationships of bacteria could be determined by comparing a stable part of the genetic code. (Woese, et al, 1985;Woo, et al, 2003). Candidates for this genetic area in bacteria included the genes that code for the 5S, the 16S and the 23S rRNA and the spaces between these genes.…”