Usefulness of the CAPE-P15 for detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Psychometric properties and cut-off values

Bukenaite, Akvile; Štochl, Jan; Mossaheb, Nilufar; Schäfer, Miriam R.; Klier, Claudia M.; Becker, Jana; Schloegelhofer, Monika; Παπαγεωργίου, Κ.; Montejo, Ángel L.; Russo, Debra A.; Jones, Peter B.; Pérez, Jesús; Amminger, G. Paul

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.017

Cited by 63 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Internal consistency of the scale was McDonalds Ω = 0.788. The CAPE is not a diagnostic tool; however, the CAPE-P with a cut-off of 1.47 had a positive predictive value of 66% to detect people at ultra-high risk for psychosis [ 52 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic forced millions of people to drastically change their social life habits as governments employed harsh restrictions to reduce the spread of the virus. Although beneficial to physical health, the perception of physical distancing and related restrictions could impact mental health. In a pre-registered online survey, we assessed how effective a range of restrictions were perceived, how severely they affected daily life, general distress and paranoia during the early phase of the outbreak in Brazil, Colombia, Germany, Israel, Norway and USA. Most of our over 2000 respondents rated the restrictions as effective. School closings were perceived as having the strongest effect on daily life. Participants who believed their country reacted too mildly perceived the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 to be higher, were more worried and expressed reduced beliefs in the ability to control the outbreak. Relatedly, dissatisfaction with governmental reactions corresponded with increased distress levels. Together, we found that satisfaction with one's governmental reactions and fear appraisal play an important role in assessing the efficacy of restrictions during the pandemic and their related psychological outcomes. These findings inform policy-makers on the psychological factors that strengthen resilience and foster the well-being of citizens in times of global crisis.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Internal consistency of the scale was McDonalds Ω = .788. The CAPE is not a diagnostic tool, however the CAPE-P with a cut-off of 1.47 had a positive predictive value of 66% to detect people at ultra-high risk for psychosis (42).…”

Section: Cape-p Itemsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries

Mækelæ¹,

Reggev²,

Dutra³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic forced millions of people to drastically change their social life habits as governments employed harsh restrictions to reduce the spread of the virus. Although beneficial to physical health, the perception of physical distancing and related countermeasures could impact mental health. In a pre-registered online survey, we assessed how effective a range of countermeasures were perceived, how severely they affected daily life, general distress and paranoia during the early phase of the outbreak in Brazil, Colombia, Germany, Israel, Norway and US.Most of our over 2000 respondents rated the countermeasures as effective. School closings were perceived as having the strongest effect on daily life. Participants who believed their country reacted too mildly perceived the risk of contracting Sars-CoV-2 to be higher, were more worried and expressed reduced beliefs in the ability to control the outbreak. Relatedly, dissatisfaction with governmental actions corresponded with increased distress levels.Together, we found that satisfaction with one's governmental actions and fear appraisal play an important role in assessing the efficacy of countermeasures during the pandemic and their related psychological outcomes. These findings inform policy-makers on the psychological factors that strengthen resilience and foster the well-being of citizens in times of global crisis.

show abstract

“…Another important future research direction is to examine the clinical utility and validity of the Indonesian CAPE. There have been evidence that the CAPE can be used to screen individuals being at high risk of psychosis in Austria (Bukenaite et al, 2017) and China (Mark & Toulopoulou, 2017). The results from the two studies in Austria and China are suggestive of possible universal clinical utility of the CAPE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences

Jaya¹

2017

Makara Hubs-Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self-report questionnaire that measures lifetime psychotic experiences. However, despite being popular, a consistent factorial structure across nations has not been found. Furthermore, the factorial structure of the Indonesian version has not been examined questioning the types of symptoms that can be measured. Cross-sectional community sample from Indonesia (N = 844) was used in this study. Confirmatory factor analyses results showed that the original three dimensions and nine dimensions factorial structure of the CAPE were found to have an acceptable fit to the data. However, the nine dimensions factorial structure has significantly better fit than the three dimensions. Therefore, the Indonesian version of the CAPE consists of positive symptoms (bizarre experiences, hallucinations, paranoia, magical thinking and grandiosity), negative symptoms (affective flattening, social withdrawal, and avolition) and depressive symptoms. Analisis Faktor Konfirmatoris Dari Assesmen Komunitas terhadap Pengalaman Psikotik versi Indonesia AbstrakAsesmen Komunitas terhadap Pengalaman Psikotik (AKPP) adalah kuesioner populer yang mengukur pengalaman psikotik seumur hidup. Namun, meskipun populer, struktur faktor yang konsisten antar negara-negara belum ditemukan. Selain itu, struktur faktor untuk kuesioner versi Indonesia belum diteliti. Tanpa mengetahui struktur faktor kuesioner AKPP dalam bahasa Indonesia, kita tidak dapat mengetahui jenis gejala psikotik apa saja yang dapat diukur dengan baik di Indonesia dengan kuesioner ini. Sampel komunitas cross-sectional dari Indonesia (N = 844) digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Analisis faktor konfirmatori menunjukkan bahwa tiga dimensi dan sembilan dimensi struktur faktor AKPP memiliki fit yang baik dengan data. Namun, sembilan dimensi struktur faktorial lebih cocok daripada tiga dimensi secara signifikan. Oleh karena itu, AKPP bisa dianggap mengukur gejala positif (pengalaman aneh, halusinasi, paranoia, pemikiran magis, dan waham kebesaran), gejala negatif (afek datar, penarikan sosial, dan amotivasi) dan gejala depresi.

show abstract

Usefulness of the CAPE-P15 for detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Psychometric properties and cut-off values

Cited by 63 publications

References 23 publications

Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries

Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries

Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About