Usefulness of silicone elastomer sheet as another option of adhesion preventive material during craniectomies

Lee, Choon-Hyun; Cho, Do Sang; Jin, Sung-Chul; Kim, Sung-Hak; Park, Dong-Been

doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.05.015

Cited by 34 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It can limit the migration of fibroblasts and reduce collagen deposition. Various materials including silastic, synthetic membranes or foams, and free or pedicle fat grafts have been applied as barriers to reduce scar formation [8,14,18]. However, none of them has been widely accepted with consistent results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implantation of amniotic membrane to reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions

Huang

Fan

2009

Eur Spine J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Postlaminectomy epidural adhesion is implicated as a main cause of ''failed back surgery syndrome'' and associated with increased risk of complications during revision surgery. Various materials acting as mechanical barriers to reduce fibroblasts infiltration into epidural space have met with limited success. In present research, amniotic membrane (AM) was studied to investigate its effects on reducing epidural scar adhesion after laminectomy in a canine model. Laminectomy sites were created at L-1, L-3, L-5, and L-7 levels in 24 adult mongrel dogs. Freeze dried AM (FAM), cross-linked AM (CAM), and autologous free fat (AFF) were implanted, respectively, at a randomly assigned site in each dog with the remaining untreated site serving as internal control. The animals were sacrificed at 1, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Then, gross pathologic observation including scar amount and adhesion tenacity, qualitative histology evaluation, and quantitative histology analysis were compared. Gross observation demonstrated that scar amount and adhesion tenacity of CAM group were significantly lower in comparison with those of FAM and non-treatment groups. A white, slightly vascularized CAM layer covered the dura mater without tenacious scar adhesion. The histology analysis also indicated reduced fibroblasts infiltration and consequent epidural fibrosis, which were similar to the results of AFF group. In conclusion, the CAM is effective in reducing epidural fibrosis and scar adhesion after laminectomy in canine model. It is a promising biomaterial for future clinical applications.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implantation of amniotic membrane to reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions

Huang

Fan

2009

Eur Spine J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Alternatively, the formation of such a layer may be done by the use of silicone or poly-tetra-fluoro-ethylene sheets [49,50]. …”

Section: Surgical Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical Aspects of Decompression Craniectomy in Malignant Stroke: Review

Zweckberger¹,

Jüettler

Bösel

et al. 2014

Cerebrovasc Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Space-occupying malignant stroke of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is associated with a high mortality rate of up to 80% under conservative treatment. Although there is convincing evidence that decompression craniectomy can significantly reduce mortality rate and improve neurological outcome in young patients (<60 years), many surgeons are still hesitant to recommend hemicraniectomy for stroke patients. Summary: This review addresses some major issues that appear to be an obstacle to decompression craniectomy, in particular, indicating surgery for patients >60 years or with infarcts of the dominant hemisphere. Furthermore, it emphasizes technical issues such as timing and size of the craniectomy, additional temporal lobectomy, and resection of the temporal muscle, as well as duraplasty and cranioplasty. According to the current literature, decompression craniectomy in older patients can increase survival without most severe disabilities, although, most survivors need assistance in most bodily needs. Involvement of the dominant hemisphere results in aphasia that might partly recover in younger patients, although, considering the neuropsychological deficits caused by infarctions of the nondominant hemisphere, involvement of the dominant hemisphere does not pose as a contraindication for decompression craniectomy. Furthermore, there is convincing evidence that surgery should be performed within 48 h after the onset of symptoms and the size of the craniectomy should be at least 12 cm as a minimum. An additional lobectomy or the resection of the temporal muscle, however, can only be part of individual treatment options. Conceding the weak evidence, it is recommended to close the dura by some form of a duraplasty avoiding cerebrospinal fluid leakages or scarring between the cortex and the scalp leading to injuries during reimplantation of the bone-flap. Complications associated with decompression surgery (hemorrhages, infections, ‘sinking skin-flap syndrome', cerebrospinal fluid leakages, hydrocephalus, seizures), with the infarction itself, or with those that occur during the ICU course (cardiac and pulmonary complications) appear acceptable and are mostly treatable, especially considering the fatal course of conservative treatment. Key Message: This review summarizes the current state of the literature about decompression craniectomy of patients with malignant stroke addressing, in particular, critical surgical issues, and thus, help surgeons to make decisions confidently for/or against performing surgery.

show abstract

“…Much of the modern literature regarding cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is based on case series that emphasize the technical aspects of the procedure such as the use of materials, 2,3,9,10,12,14,26,30,33,35,[50][51][52]54,55,60,63,68,70,71 the use of techniques to store the bone flap prior to reconstruction, 16,19,24,25,43,48,49,72 the timing of surgical intervention, 6,37 or other specific modifications to either the craniectomy or cranioplasty procedure, which may influence the cranioplasty. 20,28,34,36,38,41,47,67 There are relatively few modern-day large clinical series describing the clinical outcomes and perioperative complications of cranioplasties in the setting of nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury and large vessel infarction. 40,42 Complications after cranial reconstruction, often viewed as a straightforward neurosurgical procedure, may very well be underreported.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases

Gooch

Gin²,

Kenning³

et al. 2009

FOC

386

261

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Object Decompressive craniectomy is a potentially life-saving procedure used in the treatment of medically refractory intracranial hypertension, most commonly in the setting of trauma or cerebral infarction. Once performed, surviving patients are obligated to undergo a second procedure for cranial reconstruction. The complications following cranial reconstruction are not well described in the literature and may very well be underreported. A review of the complications would suggest measures to improve the care of these patients. Methods A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients who had undergone cranioplasty during a 7-year period. Demographic data, indications for craniectomy, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters following cranioplasty, were recorded. Perioperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. Patients were classified as having no complications, any complications, and complications requiring reoperation. The groups were compared to identify risk factors predictive of poor outcomes. Results The authors identified 62 patients who had undergone cranioplasty. The immediate postoperative complication rate was 34%. Of these, 46 patients did not require reoperation and 16 did. Of those requiring reoperation, 7 were due to infection, 2 from wound breakdown, 2 from intracranial hemorrhage, 3 from bone resorption, and 1 from a sunken cranioplasty, and 1 patient's cranioplasty procedure was prematurely ended due to intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia. The only factor statistically associated with need for reoperation was the presence of a bifrontal cranial defect (bifrontal: 8 [67%] of 12, requiring reoperation; unilateral: 8 [16%] of 49 requiring reoperation; p < 0.01) Conclusions Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is associated with a high complication rate. Patients undergoing a bifrontal craniectomy are at significantly increased risk for postcranioplasty complications, including the need for reoperation.

show abstract

Usefulness of silicone elastomer sheet as another option of adhesion preventive material during craniectomies

Cited by 34 publications

References 11 publications

Implantation of amniotic membrane to reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions

Implantation of amniotic membrane to reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions

Surgical Aspects of Decompression Craniectomy in Malignant Stroke: Review

Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About