Background
The changing epidemiology of cardiac allograft rejection has prompted many to question the yield of surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in heart transplant (HT) patients. We sought to determine the yield of EMB in the modern era.
Methods
We evaluated 2,597 EMBs in 182 consecutive HT patients who survived to their first EMB. EMBs were categorized as asymptomatic or clinically driven and were compared based on era of antiproliferative therapy use at our center (early azathioprine era: 1990–2000 vs. modern mycophenolate era: 2000–2011).
Results
In the modern era, patients had a higher prevalence of risk factors for developing rejection (≥ ISHLT grade 2R); however the frequency of rejection was decreased at all times (0–6 months: 60.2% vs. 21.5%, P < 0.001, 6–12 months: 26.8% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001, 12–36 months: 32.3% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.006). The yield of asymptomatic EMB decreased in the modern era between 0–6 months (10.9% vs. 3.12%), 6–12 months (17% vs. 0 %), and years 2–3 (6.1% vs. 1.5%). In the early era, the odds ratio of rejection during asymptomatic EMB compared to a clinically driven EMB was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31–0.71) and was decreased in the modern era (0.17[0.07–0.42], P = 0.04). The probability of detecting rejection on asymptomatic EMB was significantly reduced in the modern era, even after adjustment for tacrolimus and induction therapy (1% vs. 8%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
The clinical yield of surveillance EMB has decreased in the modern era. EMB in asymptomatic patients >6 months after HT warrants further scrutiny.