2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2009.002917.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of procalcitonin rapid test for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children in the emergency department

Abstract: We concluded that a rapid determination of PCT concentration could be useful for the management of children with febrile UTI in the emergency room.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
15
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the lowest specificity for CRP was detected by Ayazi et al 16 while the highest specificity was reported by Kotoula et al 21 . Specificity of CRP was similar to the other studies of Biggi, 11 Nikfar 15 and Güven et al 17 (68%, 65%…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, the lowest specificity for CRP was detected by Ayazi et al 16 while the highest specificity was reported by Kotoula et al 21 . Specificity of CRP was similar to the other studies of Biggi, 11 Nikfar 15 and Güven et al 17 (68%, 65%…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although CRP had been reported as a significant biomarker of pyelonephritis in previous studies 9,[11][12][13][14][15] controversy about this data had also been revealed [16][17][18] . The median PCT level in our experience was also higher in children with pyelonephritis, as confirmed by other studies [12][13][14][15] . However, the significance of PCT as a predictor in pyelonephritis was not shown by several studies in children 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of Technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy(DMSA), Nikfar et al found procalcitonin concentration test could also be useful in the diagnosis of APN with 77% and 89% of sensitivity and specificity comparing to 80% and 65% of C-reative protein(CRP) (Nikfar, Khotaee et al 2010). However, DMSA still remains the standard tool for diagnosis of APN (Levitchenko, Lahy et al 2001).…”
Section: Acute Pyelonephritismentioning
confidence: 99%