2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners

Abstract: BackgroundChlamydia is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the Netherlands. The majority of chlamydia diagnoses are made by general practitioners (GPs). Baseline data from primary care will facilitate the future evaluation of the ongoing large population-based screening in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of electronic medical records for monitoring the incidence of chlamydia cases diagnosed in primary care in the Netherlands.MethodsIn the electron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, an increasing trend was observed in the numbers of consultations for STI testing at STI clinics, however positivity rates remained fairly stable [19]. A substantial fraction of cases are diagnosed and treated by GPs and are not reported to national surveillance [20]. In 2001, Chlamydia prevalence was measured in the general population in a sample of 3458 men and 4925 women [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, an increasing trend was observed in the numbers of consultations for STI testing at STI clinics, however positivity rates remained fairly stable [19]. A substantial fraction of cases are diagnosed and treated by GPs and are not reported to national surveillance [20]. In 2001, Chlamydia prevalence was measured in the general population in a sample of 3458 men and 4925 women [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insight into STI consultations in general practice is limited to reporting rates from sentinel surveillance based on electronic medical registration by International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) codes. These data lack information on diagnostic tests performed and patient characteristics of those tested 1 2. Since an estimated 70% of all STI/HIV consultations take place at the general practice in the Netherlands,1 3 more detailed data on STI consultations in primary care are required to gain a more comprehensive overview of the STI epidemiology and testing behaviour in the country, necessary for surveillance and control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their “Comparison of STI-Related Consultations among Ethnic Groups in the Netherlands,” Woestenberg and colleagues [ 27 ] used the application EPICON “that groups consultations with similar ICPC-codes occurring less than two months apart” ([ 27 , p. 2]; [ 28 ]). Following the example of Suijkerbuijk and colleagues on Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed by GPs in the Netherlands [ 29 , p. 3], we counted a second episode with the same diagnosis for the same patient as a new case only after an interval of at least two months after the beginning date of the first diagnosis. We defined the two month-interval as 62 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%