2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of multiple frequency band source localizations in ictal MEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous studies had used either a manual selection of a particular period distinct from the BGA 36 or a wide time window. 7 The present study selected a 4-second ictal window and computed non-time-resolved frequency analysis, to circumvent the subjective bias of time window selection. This approach increases the SNR and improves the localization accuracy.…”
Section: Source Localization With Beamformermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, previous studies had used either a manual selection of a particular period distinct from the BGA 36 or a wide time window. 7 The present study selected a 4-second ictal window and computed non-time-resolved frequency analysis, to circumvent the subjective bias of time window selection. This approach increases the SNR and improves the localization accuracy.…”
Section: Source Localization With Beamformermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, ictal MEG data are rare, and very limited reports are available, studied on small cohorts. Previous studies had analyzed ictal MEG data in lower frequency bandwidth (<45 Hz), 6 except in a study 7 that reported multiple frequency band analysis up to gamma band (<70 Hz). None of the studies had evaluated ictal the MEG record for high-frequency oscillations (HFOs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movement compensation [26,52] and the projection of recorded data to a standard virtual MEG helmet [53] enable the correction of (limited) patient movement during a seizure and increases the percentage of usable MEG recordings. Analytically, the application of STFT [27,28,31] for identification of seizure onsets, and the use of distributed source localization approaches [32,34], especially frequency-based methods [31], seem to improve the localization accuracy in comparison to ECD approaches. Regarding MEG ictal focus localization, there is very little data on specific aspect of localization methodology in lesional subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if such problems do not occur, the SNR of ictal activity may be low at the seizure onset, resulting in localization issues. Frequency-based methods, such as STFT [27,28] or multiple-frequency-band source localization [31] may be helpful in such circumstances. Furthermore, general limitations of MEG, such as artifacts due to metal implants, are of course also relevant for ictal recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation