Abstract:The minute surface structure and microvessels observed by magnifying endoscopy were related to histopathological findings. Magnifying endoscopy is valuable for predicting the histological nature in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer.
“…The fine observation provides information about histological characteristics of the detected lesions. Small regular patterns were observed more frequently in differentiated adenocarcinoma; lack of visible structure and irregular patterns were characteristic to undifferentiated adenocarcinoma (Otsuka et al, 2004). In differentiated carcinoma, the regular SECN pattern disappeared and irregular microvessels proliferated within the cancerous mucosa.…”
Section: High-grade Dysplasia (Hgd) and Early Gastric Cancer (Egc)mentioning
“…The fine observation provides information about histological characteristics of the detected lesions. Small regular patterns were observed more frequently in differentiated adenocarcinoma; lack of visible structure and irregular patterns were characteristic to undifferentiated adenocarcinoma (Otsuka et al, 2004). In differentiated carcinoma, the regular SECN pattern disappeared and irregular microvessels proliferated within the cancerous mucosa.…”
Section: High-grade Dysplasia (Hgd) and Early Gastric Cancer (Egc)mentioning
“…Therefore, it is often found that the definitive diagnosis of MALT lymphoma can not be obtained after multiple biopsies even in cases where gastric MALT lymphoma is suspected based on endoscopic features of conventional endoscopy. The usefulness of magnified endoscopy (ME) combined with narrow band imaging (NBI) is well recognized in the diagnosis of gastritis and gastric cancer [6][7][8][9] . Recently, the characteristic features of gastric MALT lymphoma, based on magnified endoscopic imaging without NBI, were reported by Ono et al [10] .…”
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description in the English literature of magnifying endoscopic classification and the characteristic definition of gastric post-ER scar lesions which includes comparative pathology for both magnifying and conventional procedures. Diagnosis of early gastric cancer relies on macroscopic findings by CE, namely flat, elevated, or depressed; color identical to the neighboring noncancerous area, red or pale; the presence of granules or nodules; the presence or absence of ulcers; and the presence or absence of fold conversions, among others [13] . During diagnostic endoscopy, the endoscopist usually takes routine biopsies from even inconspicuous lesions that appear slightly erythematous, discolored, flat, granular, or shallow depressed mucosal areas in the stomach [14,21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ME with a narrow band image can aid in deciding the target of endoscopic biopsy for surveillance in Barrett's esophagus [5][6][7][8] . The relationships between ME findings and gastric neoplastic histology, including the types of cancer detected, are now being investigated, and the usefulness of ME for diagnosing early gastric cancer has been reported [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] .…”
AIM:To investigate the relationship between postendoscopic resection (ER) scars on magnifying endoscopy (ME) and the pathological diagnosis in order to validate the clinical significance of ME. From January, 2007 to June, 2008 patients with 129 post-ER scar lesions were enrolled. Mucosal pit patterns on ME were compared with conventional endoscopy (CE) findings and histological results obtained from targeted biopsies.
METHODS:
RESULTS:CE findings showed nodular scars (53/129), erythematous scars (85/129), and ulcerative scars (4/129). The post-ER scars were classified into four pit patterns of sulci and ridges on ME: (Ⅰ) 47 round; (Ⅱ) 54 short rod or tubular; (Ⅲ) 19 branched or gyrus-like; and (Ⅳ) 9 destroyed pits. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% and 62.5%, respectively, by the presence of nodularity on CE. Erythematous lesions were high sensitivity (100%), but specificity was as low as 36.7%. The range of the positive predictive value (PPV) on CE was as low as 10.6%-25%. Nine type Ⅳ pit patterns were diagnosed as tumor lesions, and 120 cases of type Ⅰ-Ⅲ pit patterns revealed non-neoplastic lesions. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and the PPV of ME were 100%. CONCLUSION: ME findings can detect the presence of tumor in post-ER scar lesions, and make evident the biopsy target site in short-term follow-up. Further large-scale and long-term studies are needed to determine whether ME can replace endoscopic biopsy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.