2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of FC-TRIPLEX Chagas/Leish IgG1 as confirmatory assay for non-negative results in blood bank screening of Chagas disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In human VL, several studies have shown issues related to cross-reactivity with Chagas disease, owing to the sharing of antigens associated with phylogenetic proximity [47,48]. However, we demonstrated that the mixture of peptides increased the specificity and accuracy compared to that shown by isolated peptides, as confirmed by the higher performance values and lower crossreactivity in T. cruzi, E. canis, and B. canis pathogens [49], and have previously reported that the association of antigens can lead to better performance because of the use of a single platform for the simultaneous serological measurement of antibodies against different antigens of L. infantum. This fact can be associated with the binding of antibodies with higher avidity to the antigens, and the peptide mix could select these antibodies more effectively, favoring a more specific interaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In human VL, several studies have shown issues related to cross-reactivity with Chagas disease, owing to the sharing of antigens associated with phylogenetic proximity [47,48]. However, we demonstrated that the mixture of peptides increased the specificity and accuracy compared to that shown by isolated peptides, as confirmed by the higher performance values and lower crossreactivity in T. cruzi, E. canis, and B. canis pathogens [49], and have previously reported that the association of antigens can lead to better performance because of the use of a single platform for the simultaneous serological measurement of antibodies against different antigens of L. infantum. This fact can be associated with the binding of antibodies with higher avidity to the antigens, and the peptide mix could select these antibodies more effectively, favoring a more specific interaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In a previous report of anti- T. cruzi IgG1 levels following accidental infection with T. cruzi , the anti- T. cruzi IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4 returned to pre-infection levels 55 days post-chemotherapy and 80 days after infection, whereas the IgG2 titres remained high at 300 days after infection [ 59 ]. Anti- T. cruzi IgG1 serology has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for screening blood donors when conventional serological methods (ELISA and IIF) previously gave inconclusive results [ 60 ]. Similarly, anti-epimastigote IgG1 has been able to distinguish between T. cruzi -infected and non-infected individuals [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological tests cannot discriminate between treated individuals and those with CD and have shown inconsistent results in adult studies [ 9 ]. Blood bank evaluations rely on serological testing, and confirmation assays must be performed to elucidate the status of non-negative results [ 10 , 11 ]. In addition, seroreversion, the gold standard, can take decades in adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%