2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans offer a very good anatomical definition, they are not specific enough to discriminate cancer from chronic pancreatitis and to define local infiltration of the disease and local lymph node metastasis (50). The addition of 2FDG-PET to the CT scan has been proposed to increase the sensitivity of detection of local infiltration but the results of 2FDG-PET have been very inconsistent (51), and this imaging modality is not used for staging pancreatic cancer. The use of Me4FDG, which is actively accumulated in cancer cells, has the potential to improve detection of pancreatic cancer by PET, thus allowing a better definition of the local extension of the disease and providing a better guide for the therapeutic management of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans offer a very good anatomical definition, they are not specific enough to discriminate cancer from chronic pancreatitis and to define local infiltration of the disease and local lymph node metastasis (50). The addition of 2FDG-PET to the CT scan has been proposed to increase the sensitivity of detection of local infiltration but the results of 2FDG-PET have been very inconsistent (51), and this imaging modality is not used for staging pancreatic cancer. The use of Me4FDG, which is actively accumulated in cancer cells, has the potential to improve detection of pancreatic cancer by PET, thus allowing a better definition of the local extension of the disease and providing a better guide for the therapeutic management of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, overall survival did not differ between the three treatment groups. This study had several limitations, FDG-PET/CT may have a role in staging and survival prediction of PDAC and may add to other diagnostic information, such as that provided by histology (31). Low FDG uptake in PET scans of patients with stage I and II pancreatic cancer correlates with superior overall survival and recurrence-free survival, suggesting that glucose metabolic pathways are important in pancreatic cancer biology and that PET scan activity can be used as a prognostic biomarker after pancreatectomy (32).…”
Section: α-Smooth Muscle Actin (αSma) Expression According To Treatmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of PET in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is unclear with significant false positives and negatives 5. The improved oxygenation following methylprednisolone therapy may have related to decreased oedema and secretions such as seen when used with lymphangitis carcinomatosis 6 or to the anti‐inflammatory and tumour angiogenesis suppressive effects of corticosteroids 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%