2011
DOI: 10.1097/rct.0b013e31822bd498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Follow-Up of Coil Embolization With the Enterprise Stent for Cerebral Aneurysms

Abstract: For follow-up after coiling with an Enterprise stent, CE-MRA may be necessary to avoid susceptibility artifacts caused by the stent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
39
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Unlike MRA, the additional advantage of skull plain films is that their diagnostic accuracy is not affected by the coil materials or device assistance, including stents. 12,13 There were some limitations in this study. First, the study design was retrospective for a small number of cases, which might not be enough to draw a conclusion in proving the efficacy of skull plain films.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,11 Unlike MRA, the additional advantage of skull plain films is that their diagnostic accuracy is not affected by the coil materials or device assistance, including stents. 12,13 There were some limitations in this study. First, the study design was retrospective for a small number of cases, which might not be enough to draw a conclusion in proving the efficacy of skull plain films.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 However, these imaging studies have some disadvantages in reality. [8][9][10][11][12][13] In contrast, skull plain films have been conventional imaging tools because they are simple, inexpensive, less invasive, and applicable to every patient under any circumstances. However, the efficacy of skull plain films has been infrequently reported in the follow-up imaging of coiled aneurysms, [14][15][16] in which the detailed methods used for analysis were obscure and their reliability questionable.…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with TOF MRA, Silent MRA images are easy to interpret because they consist of only the labeled blood flow signal. Takayama et al 16 reported that contrast-enhanced MRA is useful when visualizing flow in a stent, though DSA remains a superior follow-up tool for stent-assisted coil embolization. Also, while rare, contrast agents might induce serious adverse events such as anaphylaxis or nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, stent occlusion was evaluated by CE-MRA or DSA, because it is difficult to evaluate the patency of artery on time-of-flight MRA due to susceptibility artifact from the ES. 17) In current study, there was no stent occlusion and no recurrence of aneurysm in all 10 patients who underwent follow-up with CE-MRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%