2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of alpha-fetoprotein response in patients treated with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
164
2
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
164
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al [18] reported that AFP and DCP response were independent factors associated with survival. Personeni et al [17] reported that AFP response is an independent surrogate end point for survival in patients treated with sorafenib. Similarly, a ≥ 50% decline in AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ after the second cycle of HAIC treatment was associated with better outcomes among the patients with elevated AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ levels prior to the initiation of HAIC treatment (though PIVKA-Ⅱ reduction is not statistically significant by multivariate analysis) (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Park et al [18] reported that AFP and DCP response were independent factors associated with survival. Personeni et al [17] reported that AFP response is an independent surrogate end point for survival in patients treated with sorafenib. Similarly, a ≥ 50% decline in AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ after the second cycle of HAIC treatment was associated with better outcomes among the patients with elevated AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ levels prior to the initiation of HAIC treatment (though PIVKA-Ⅱ reduction is not statistically significant by multivariate analysis) (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient's liver function was classified according to the scheme of Child-Pugh. AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ reduction were calculated according to the formula [(baseline levellevel after the second cycle)/(baseline level) × 100] in patients whose AFP was elevated above 20 ng/mL [17] and PIVKA-Ⅱ was elevated above 40 mAU/mL [18] . The treatment toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 4.0 [19] .…”
Section: Study Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent studies have investigated plasma biomarkers as potential markers of response to sorafenib (and other antiangiogenic therapies), such as α-fetoprotein [52][53][54][55], and additional research is ongoing. There are also some small studies that suggest that sorafenib AEs (e.g., skin toxicity and hypertension) may be markers of clinical efficacy and that the pattern of disease progression on sorafenib treatment may predict the postprogression prognosis [27,56].…”
Section: Identifying Markers Of Tumor Response May Help To Guide Soramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the AFP level has been considered as an important predictor of postoperative HCC recurrence and metastasis (20,21). In patients with advanced HCC treated with either sorafenib, transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic artery infusional chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, an early reduction of AFP was found to be a predictor of positive outcome (22)(23)(24)(25). Furthermore, the early elevation of AFP was shown to be a predictor of unfavorable outcome in patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%