The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1966
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(66)90191-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0
6

Year Published

1972
1972
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
104
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…27 The long axis was determined in the right anterior oblique projection as the longest chord originating from the aortomitral angle (Fig 1). The short axis was calculated as the geometric mean of the derived short axes in both left and right anterior oblique projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The long axis was determined in the right anterior oblique projection as the longest chord originating from the aortomitral angle (Fig 1). The short axis was calculated as the geometric mean of the derived short axes in both left and right anterior oblique projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left ventricular end diastolic volume and left ventricular end systolic volumes (LVESV) and ejection fraction were calculated from the monoplane angiogram in a 30" right anterior oblique projection using the area length method (34). Left ventricular mass was calculated according to the equation of Trenouth et al (39, which was used to quantitate the equatorial end systolic wall thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Length of the akinetic segment (AKS) was calculated in mm. Left ventricular enddiastolic (EDS) and endsystolic volumes (ESV) were calculated using the area length method of Dodge et al (13). From the angiographically determined volumes, stroke volume (SV = EDV -ESV) and ejection fraction (EF = SV/EDV) were derived.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%