2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/151287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Useful Solutions for Plane Wave Diffraction by Dielectric Slabs and Wedges

Abstract: This work presents an overview of available uniform asymptotic physical optics solutions for evaluating the plane wave diffraction by some canonical geometries of large interest: dielectric slabs and wedges. Such solutions are based on a physical optics approximation of the electric and magnetic equivalent surface currents in the involved scattering integrals. The resulting diffraction coefficients are expressed in terms of the geometrical optics response of the considered structure and the standard transition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This last point is strictly related to the PO approximation and limits the evaluation of the scattered field at the beginning of the UAPO approach. It is authors' opinion that the inclusion of further wave contributions can improve the formulation of the equivalent surface currents to be used also in the shadow region, but this means abandoning the simplicity of the PO approximation and probably preventing the determination of a UTD-like solution in closed form as in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Go Field and Po Surface Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This last point is strictly related to the PO approximation and limits the evaluation of the scattered field at the beginning of the UAPO approach. It is authors' opinion that the inclusion of further wave contributions can improve the formulation of the equivalent surface currents to be used also in the shadow region, but this means abandoning the simplicity of the PO approximation and probably preventing the determination of a UTD-like solution in closed form as in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Go Field and Po Surface Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research team has denoted it as Uniform Asymptotic Physical Optics (UAPO) approach since it is based on the PO approximation of electric and magnetic equivalent surface currents radiating in the surrounding region. References [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] provide the UAPO solutions to some diffraction problems. Pros and cons of such solutions have been identified and highlighted in these manuscripts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], the UAPO approach allows one to isolate the high-frequency diffraction contribution that is enclosed in (6). This is possible by performing useful analytic approximations and integral evaluations.…”
Section: The Uapo Solution For the Diffraction Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-known limitations of the PO-based techniques and the absence of the surface waves in the UAPO approach can decrease the accuracy of the estimated field values in particular cases, e.g., incidence directions close to the grazing one [18]. Other canonical problems solved by means of the UAPO approach can be found in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Uniform Asymptotic Physical Optics (UAPO) approach has recently emerged as a useful, reliable, and alternative high-frequency analytical method to obtain approximate uniform solutions to plane wave diffraction problems involving penetrable and impenetrable structures [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The UAPO solutions can be used in the framework of the Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (UTD) [20] and are expressed in a closed form containing only standard functions and parameters as the trigonometric functions, the UTD transition function, and the geometrical optics (GO) response of the structure in terms of reflection and transmission coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%