2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Useful Plants as Potential Flagship Species to Counteract Plant Blindness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We wanted to find out to what degree individual interest in a specific plant group can be used to predict situational interest in a certain teaching unit (Knogler et al, ) concerning this plant group. Other questions were whether differences in situational interest would be similar to those that we already found in individual interest (Pany, ), and which reasons lead to differences in situational interest. Looking at these questions should help to better address the overall challenge: how can we use the existing interest in botanical content and contexts (in this case: useful plants) to create teaching units which successfully impart new plant‐related content?…”
Section: Interestmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We wanted to find out to what degree individual interest in a specific plant group can be used to predict situational interest in a certain teaching unit (Knogler et al, ) concerning this plant group. Other questions were whether differences in situational interest would be similar to those that we already found in individual interest (Pany, ), and which reasons lead to differences in situational interest. Looking at these questions should help to better address the overall challenge: how can we use the existing interest in botanical content and contexts (in this case: useful plants) to create teaching units which successfully impart new plant‐related content?…”
Section: Interestmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Krüger and Burmester (2005) showed that beside the "beauty of plants" (Kinchin, 1999;Tunnicliffe & Reiss, 2000), the "usefulness of plants" is a very important criterion students use to categorize plants. The study of Hammann (2011) Pany, & Kiehn, 2011) than the oftenused ornamental plants that interest only a small percentage of students (Pany, 2014;Pany & Heidinger, 2015). The work presented in this paper follows this line of investigation and aims to specify and test the best-suited study objects found amongst useful plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various aesthetic plant characteristics, such as color, shape/size and smell, drew elementary students' attention in botanic garden studies conducted by Tunnicliffe () and Sanders () respectively. Moreover, special characteristics, such as survival‐relevant knowledge about the plants have also been demonstrated to be important to plant‐based education (Pany, ; Prokop & Fančovičová, , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term plant blindness was introduced by Wandersee and Schussler in 1998, and since then numerous studies have reported on its negative consequences with regard to plant conservation (Balding & Williams, 2016) and have outlined methods to address it (Balding & Williams, 2016;Frisch, Unwin, & Saunders, 2010;Krosnick, Baker, & Moore, 2018;Pany, 2014;Pany & Heidinger, 2017;Strgar, 2007;Wandersee & Schussler, 1999,2001. Plant blindness has led to the devaluation of plants with regard to their impact on the economy and culture, environmental sustainability, and public health (Krosnick et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%