2001
DOI: 10.1080/106351501750107576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Useful Characters in Gastropod Phylogeny: Soft Information or Hard Facts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adams, 1900Adams, , 1915Ortmaun, 1920), ami therefore potentiallv contrilinting homoplasv to phvlogenetic aualvses. Adtting solt anatomv characters to a studv such as this might tlieoreticallv impiovc the resolution ol the analvses, lint manv eharactei's lre(|ueutlv used to delineati' taxa van little among pleulocerids (Dazo, 1965) and in phvlogi'iietic reeonstnatious shell chaiacters often are less homoplastic than analoniic;il cluirai'ters i Schander and Sundberg, 2001).…”
Section: Discussloxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adams, 1900Adams, , 1915Ortmaun, 1920), ami therefore potentiallv contrilinting homoplasv to phvlogenetic aualvses. Adtting solt anatomv characters to a studv such as this might tlieoreticallv impiovc the resolution ol the analvses, lint manv eharactei's lre(|ueutlv used to delineati' taxa van little among pleulocerids (Dazo, 1965) and in phvlogi'iietic reeonstnatious shell chaiacters often are less homoplastic than analoniic;il cluirai'ters i Schander and Sundberg, 2001).…”
Section: Discussloxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that shell characters are less important to establish phylogenetic relationships because their morphology is plastic in response to environmental factors and they are targets of intense selection pressure (Breure, 1979;Kool, 1993). In contrast, Schander & Sundberg (2001) and Collin (2003) concluded that there is no reason to exclude shell characters because they would be phylogenetically misleading factors. Similarly, Smith & Hendricks (2013) proposed that while the shell characters are more homoplasious Miranda, M.J.: Cladistic analysis of the Argentinian species of Bostryx than anatomical characters, they could still contribute to develop a phylogenetic hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%