2001
DOI: 10.1080/10635150118712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Useful Characters in Gastropod Phylogeny: Soft Information or Hard Facts?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…are not included) Warén described six new species, but retained more phylogenetic classification of pyramidellids. In contrast the indispensable value of using both anatomical and conchological characters for the classification of pyramidellids has been amply demonstrated in Wise (1996), Schander et al (1999b) and Schander & Sundberg (2001).…”
Section: Historical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are not included) Warén described six new species, but retained more phylogenetic classification of pyramidellids. In contrast the indispensable value of using both anatomical and conchological characters for the classification of pyramidellids has been amply demonstrated in Wise (1996), Schander et al (1999b) and Schander & Sundberg (2001).…”
Section: Historical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their shells vary dramatically in size, shape, sculpture (Goodfriend, 1986), and colour and banding pattern (Jones, Leith & Rawlings, 1977; Johnson, Murray & Clarke, 1993), both within and among species. Although shell variation can provide useful taxonomic characters (Schander & Sundberg, 2001; Jordaens et al ., 2009), levels of within‐species variation may in some cases exceed those between species or even within entire genera (Gould & Woodruff, 1978; Teshima et al ., 2003). In addition to highlighting the potential complexity of reproductive relationships among species distinguished by their shells, detailed studies of closely‐related groups of land snails, including Partula (Murray & Clarke, 1980), Cerion (Gould & Paull, 1977; Gould & Woodruff, 1978), and Ainohelix (Teshima et al ., 2003), have demonstrated the fine‐scale sampling required to distinguish among‐population variation from that distributed among reproductively isolated species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1 below). While homeomorphy is a concern in other mollusk classes as well (e.g., Schneider (2001) on bivalves; Schander and Sundberg (2001) and Wagner (2001) on gastropods), it is perceived as especially common in J-K ammonoids, which can make it difficult to separate convergent evolution from shared ancestry. Strategies do exist, however, to address homeomorphy, and rather than assuming it a priori, homeomorphy should be demonstrated by phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%