2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03649.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of X‐ray micro tomography to study the microstructure of loose‐packed and compacted milk powders

Abstract: SummaryThe use of X-rays to evaluate food microstructure has developed considerably in recent years. In this work we used X-ray micro tomography (XMT) to visualize the microstructure of loose-packed and compacted samples of spray-dried skim milk powder (SMP) and whole milk powder (WMP) and to quantify the proportion of both interstitial and occluded air voids in each sample. Visual scrutiny of the acquired XMT images showed details of the microstructure of the milk powders such as the spherical morphology of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have used a much lower limit, such as 8 or 10 voxels [ 37 , 45 ]. Assuming a sub-micrometre resolution X-ray CT system, an approximate smallest voxel size at the highest resolution is approximately 0.2 to 0.3 m. Using the 512 voxel cut-off limit, this means the smallest characterisable particle size is approximately 2 to 3 m. However, calculating the average amount of voxels across the smallest particles, in our survey of published research [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , ...…”
Section: Outlook and Limits Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have used a much lower limit, such as 8 or 10 voxels [ 37 , 45 ]. Assuming a sub-micrometre resolution X-ray CT system, an approximate smallest voxel size at the highest resolution is approximately 0.2 to 0.3 m. Using the 512 voxel cut-off limit, this means the smallest characterisable particle size is approximately 2 to 3 m. However, calculating the average amount of voxels across the smallest particles, in our survey of published research [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , ...…”
Section: Outlook and Limits Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 20 years ( Figure 1 a), more than 60 publications [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ,…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The principle of X-ray μCT analyses is based on the differences in X-ray attenuation arising from differences in material density and composition ( Chawanji et al, 2012 ). The average attenuation of the sample is expressed in Hounsfield Unit (HU) or CT number ( Donis-González et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%