2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/ursigass.2017.8105206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of WRF to generate site diversity statistics in south of France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the ANS varies between propagation parameters. At the moment, the main conclusions are as follows: Gaseous and cloud attenuations are expected to be satisfactory with some underestimation of cloud attenuation with respect to radiometric measurements. This could depend also on the specific methodology used in beacon data processing when dealing with cloud attenuation. Rain attenuation is not well predicted on an instantaneous basis, but the estimation of intensity and occurrence of the peaks of precipitation events appear to be more accurate. It is expected that there will be an acceptable statistical agreement between ANS statistics and measurements for long periods (ie, one or more years). At the moment, it appears that the comparison between the ANS and measurements is more useful to improve the ANS (eg, to identify sites where the ANS configuration needs to be improved to reproduce better local conditions) rather than to improve beacon data processing. …”
Section: Execution Of the Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of the ANS varies between propagation parameters. At the moment, the main conclusions are as follows: Gaseous and cloud attenuations are expected to be satisfactory with some underestimation of cloud attenuation with respect to radiometric measurements. This could depend also on the specific methodology used in beacon data processing when dealing with cloud attenuation. Rain attenuation is not well predicted on an instantaneous basis, but the estimation of intensity and occurrence of the peaks of precipitation events appear to be more accurate. It is expected that there will be an acceptable statistical agreement between ANS statistics and measurements for long periods (ie, one or more years). At the moment, it appears that the comparison between the ANS and measurements is more useful to improve the ANS (eg, to identify sites where the ANS configuration needs to be improved to reproduce better local conditions) rather than to improve beacon data processing. …”
Section: Execution Of the Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 It is expected that there will be an acceptable statistical agreement between ANS statistics and measurements for long periods (ie, one or more years). 47 At the moment, it appears that the comparison between the ANS and measurements is more useful to improve the ANS (eg, to identify sites where the ANS configuration needs to be improved to reproduce better local conditions) rather than to improve beacon data processing.…”
Section: Computing the Complementary Cumulated Distribution Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid is centered over our point of interest, i.e. the location of our propagation experiment and it extends over 150x150 km² depending on the configuration used [5].…”
Section: B Rain Attenuation Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion to specific attenuation is described in detail in [17]. Previous NAS experiments have been successfully carried out at Kaband [18]. Based on these simulations, long-term statistics of atmospheric attenuation can be obtained.…”
Section: Numerical Atmospheric Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%