2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of wood elemental composition to predict heat treatment intensity and decay resistance of different softwood and hardwood species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
38
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
38
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows that for all Tunisian softwood species, the weight losses (WL) due to fungal attack were correlated with mass losses resulting from thermal degradation reactions. The durability was almost complete (weight loss is close to 3% ) when the mass loss reaches 12% as previously reported by Chaouch et al 2010, Sustersic et al 2010, Hakkou et al 2006and Welzbacher et al 2007. …”
Section: Correlation Between O/c Ratio Decay Resistance (Wl %) and Msupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 4 shows that for all Tunisian softwood species, the weight losses (WL) due to fungal attack were correlated with mass losses resulting from thermal degradation reactions. The durability was almost complete (weight loss is close to 3% ) when the mass loss reaches 12% as previously reported by Chaouch et al 2010, Sustersic et al 2010, Hakkou et al 2006and Welzbacher et al 2007. …”
Section: Correlation Between O/c Ratio Decay Resistance (Wl %) and Msupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The thermal susceptibility differences between hardwood and softwood species are more pronounced for mass loss higher than 8%. Similar result have been found by Chaouch et al (2010) in a study of the correlation between mass loss and treatment intensity (time and temperature) during the heat treatment of several wood species such as silver fir, pine, beech, poplar and ash. The main difference concerns the thermal degradation kinetics, which is directly influenced by the treatment temperature (Candelier et al 2011) and the quantity of acetic acid liberated during the heat treatment (Stamm 1956).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, whatever is the studied wood species, when a mass loss of 12 % is reached, the decay resistance is improved to confer a durability class 3. Similar results have been found by Chaouch et al (2010) indicating that treatment intensity represented by mass loss comprised between 10 and 12 % improves significantly the decay resistance of several hardwood and softwood species.…”
Section: Prediction Of Decay Resistancesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations