Use of Video-assisted Intubation Devices in the Management of Patients with Trauma

Aziz, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2012.10.001

Cited by 39 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A previous study has shown that cervical collars significantly reduce the mouth opening to varying degrees depending on the various types of neck collars. 23 Our results are consistent with those of previous studies, 24 and provide more detailed ETI performance data for the various devices. For the Philadelphia neck collar, which is semi-rigid and allows only a moderate limit of mouth opening, both types of video laryngoscopy have superiority over DL.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Efficacy of various types of laryngoscope (direct, Pentax Airway Scope and GlideScope) for endotracheal intubation in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: a randomised cross-over simulation study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of direct laryngoscopy (DL), Pentax Airway Scope (PAWS) and GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) systems for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: manual in-line stabilisation (MILS), Philadelphia neck collar (PNC) (moderate limit of mouth opening) and Stifneck collar (SNC) (severe limit of mouth opening).DesignRandomised cross-over simulation study.Setting and Participants35 physicians who had >30 successful ETI experiences at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea.Primary and secondary outcome measuresParticipants performed ETI using PAWS, GVL and DL randomly in simulated MILS, PNC and SNC scenarios in our simulation centre. The end points were successful ETI and the time to complete ETI. In addition, modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) classification and pressure to teeth were recorded.ResultsIn MILS, there were no significant differences in the rate of success of ETI between the three devices: 33/35(94.3%) for DL vs 32/35(91.4%) for GVL vs 35/35(100.0%) for PAWS; p=0.230). PAWS achieved successful ETI more quickly (19.8 s) than DL (29.6 s) and GVL (35.4 s). For the PNC scenario, a higher rate of successful ETI was achieved with GVL 33/35 (94.3%) than PAWS 29/35 (82.9%) or DL 25/35 (71.4%) (p=0.040). For the SNC scenario, a higher rate of successful ETI was achieved with GVL 28/35(80.0%) than with DL 14/35(40.0%) and PAWS 7/35(20.0%) (p<0.001). For the PNC and SNC scenarios, GVL provided a relatively good view of the glottis, but a frequent pressure to teeth occurred.ConclusionsAll three devices are suitable for ETI in MILS. DL is not suitable in both neck collar scenarios. PAWS showed faster intubations in MILS, but was not suitable in the SNC scenario. GVL is most suitable in all cervical immobilisation scenarios, but may cause pressure to teeth more frequently.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Efficacy of various types of laryngoscope (direct, Pentax Airway Scope and GlideScope) for endotracheal intubation in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: a randomised cross-over simulation study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has quickly become a first line strategy for potential and/or encountered difficult intubation (DI). [2345] In some institutions and settings, it has even replaced DL as a substitute for routine cases requiring ETI. [3]…”

Section: Current Evidence On the Use Of Vlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[1] This emergence has been ushered in by increasing use of VL in patients with difficult airways or as a rescue device in failed intubation attempts. [2345] Despite a lack of clear evidence suggesting VL improves overall ETI success,[6789] VL has quickly become a well-established tool in the armamentarium of the anesthesiologist as well as other healthcare providers (e.g., emergency department, intensive care unit, and prehospital settings) involved in airway management. [1011]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Videolaryngoscopy

Chemsian

Bhananker

Ramaiah

2014

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The approach to airway management has undergone a dramatic transformation since the advent of videolaryngoscopy (VL). Videolaryngoscopes have quickly gained popularity as an intubation device in a variety of clinical scenarios and settings, as well as in the hands of airway experts and non-experts. Their indirect view of upper airway improves glottic visualization, including in suspected or encountered difficult intubation. Yet, more studies are needed to determine whether VL actually improves endotracheal intubation (ETI) success rates, intubation times, and first attempt success rates; and thereby a potential replacement to traditional direct laryngoscopy. Furthermore, advances in technology have heralded a wide array of models each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and optimal applications. Such limitations need to be better understood and alternative strategies should be available. Thus, the role of VL continues to evolve. Though it is clear VL expands the armamentarium not only for anesthesiologists, but all healthcare providers potentially involved in airway management.

show abstract

“…En manos no experimentadas en el escenario de urgencias, el uso de videolaringoscopio ha mostrado incrementar la tasa de éxito de intubación en el primer intento [42][43][44][45] .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Videolaringoscopios: ¿la solución para el manejo de la vía aérea difícil o una estrategia más? Revisión no sistemática

Chaparro-Mendoza

Luna-Montúfar

Gómez

2015

Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Use of Video-assisted Intubation Devices in the Management of Patients with Trauma

Cited by 39 publications

References 55 publications

Efficacy of various types of laryngoscope (direct, Pentax Airway Scope and GlideScope) for endotracheal intubation in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: a randomised cross-over simulation study

Efficacy of various types of laryngoscope (direct, Pentax Airway Scope and GlideScope) for endotracheal intubation in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: a randomised cross-over simulation study

Videolaryngoscopy

Videolaringoscopios: ¿la solución para el manejo de la vía aérea difícil o una estrategia más? Revisión no sistemática

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About