1993
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90561-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of vacuum tumescence device for impotence secondary to venous leakage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…75 The compliance decreases to 50-70% after 1 year of activity. 76 Blackard et al 77 reported that VCD was effective in patients with venous leak syndrome. Twenty of 29 patients with venous leak reported satisfactory results with the VCD.…”
Section: Standard Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 The compliance decreases to 50-70% after 1 year of activity. 76 Blackard et al 77 reported that VCD was effective in patients with venous leak syndrome. Twenty of 29 patients with venous leak reported satisfactory results with the VCD.…”
Section: Standard Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these three treatments (VCD, MUSE, and intracavernosal injections) have acceptable efficacy rates (33% to 68%), they also have high discontinuation rates (50% to 80%) [18,22,42]. The reasons for dissatisfaction include insufficient response to therapy, unacceptable side effects, and the feeling of anxiety and "unnaturalness" associated with using devices or injections.…”
Section: Problems With Standard Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although a published report describes efficacy rates of 60% to 80%, compliance after 1 year decreases to 50% to 70% [18] Noncompliant patients typically complain of tightness or pain from the constriction ring, diminished sensation of the phallus and glans, swiveling of the base of the penis with erection, and the laborious mechanics of using the vacuum device [19]. In addition, there is variability in the success of using the VCD each time, which leads to frustration.…”
Section: Vacuum Constriction Devicesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many anecdotal reports confirm penile enhancement in patients who use vacuum therapy concurrently with penile implants (both positionable and inflatable). The vacuum device has also been recommended for patients with a veno-occlusive disorder, with 20 of 29 patients (69%) reporting success, and as enhancement to intracavernous pharmacotherapy [2,3,11].…”
Section: Eligible Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%