2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of trace and rare earth elements to quantify autogenic and allogenic inputs within a lowland karst network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, those who contemplate this division in the modeling performance of water balance (e.g., Jukic & Denić‐Jukić, ) reached an acceptable estimation of the groundwater recharge components but only in aquifers clearly larger in size than the one exemplified here. Apart from lumped approaches, other methodologies broadly employed for evaluating the amounts of water derived from concentrated and diffuse recharge sources, such as the CV% of EC (White, ; Worthington et al, ) or conservative mixing equations (Binet et al, ; Doctor et al, ; Gill et al, ; Tobin & Schwartz, ), lead to rough estimations of the input components; water from different reservoirs usually does not have a uniform composition, and this can only be estimated approximately (Hunkeler & Mudry, ). All this reduces the reliability of the aforementioned methods, whose application should be restricted to a preliminary valuation of the recharge types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, those who contemplate this division in the modeling performance of water balance (e.g., Jukic & Denić‐Jukić, ) reached an acceptable estimation of the groundwater recharge components but only in aquifers clearly larger in size than the one exemplified here. Apart from lumped approaches, other methodologies broadly employed for evaluating the amounts of water derived from concentrated and diffuse recharge sources, such as the CV% of EC (White, ; Worthington et al, ) or conservative mixing equations (Binet et al, ; Doctor et al, ; Gill et al, ; Tobin & Schwartz, ), lead to rough estimations of the input components; water from different reservoirs usually does not have a uniform composition, and this can only be estimated approximately (Hunkeler & Mudry, ). All this reduces the reliability of the aforementioned methods, whose application should be restricted to a preliminary valuation of the recharge types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boron isotopic ratios were measured with a Neptune+, Thermo Electron inductively coupled mass spectrometer at BRGM Laboratories for samples collected in 2010 (Guerrot et al, 2011) and at the AETE-ISO technical platform of the OSU OREME at University of Montpellier for the other samples. The average value determined for the NIST SRM 951 standard was 4.67 ± 0.0033.…”
Section: Geochemical and Isotopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allogenic inflow contributes to the dissolution process introducing water that is undersaturated with respect to calcite [43,44]. Nevertheless, allogenic recharge should also be studied in respect to the diffuse recharge of karst aquifers [45,46] by using trace element analysis to distinguish allogenic runoff from karst waters. Future research in the karst system of Krania-Elassona should combine both hydrological modeling and hydrogeochemical analyses.…”
Section: Sarima Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%