2005
DOI: 10.13182/nt151-168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Thorium in Light Water Reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of these advantages, the use of thorium has been considered in different reactor concepts, such as light-water reactors (LWRs), 3 heavy-water reactors (HWRs), 4 hightemperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), 5 and molten salt reactors (MSRs). 6 In the latter one, fluoride salts are generally employed using ThF 4 , the subject of this study, as one of the components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these advantages, the use of thorium has been considered in different reactor concepts, such as light-water reactors (LWRs), 3 heavy-water reactors (HWRs), 4 hightemperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), 5 and molten salt reactors (MSRs). 6 In the latter one, fluoride salts are generally employed using ThF 4 , the subject of this study, as one of the components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first nuclear era, questions that led organizations in the nuclear industry, such as Argonne National Laboratory [19], Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) [20,21] (now Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, CNL), Babcock and Wilcox [22], Oak Ridge National Laboratory [23][24][25][26], Ontario Hydro [27], and Savannah River National Laboratory (Du Pont) [28][29][30][31] to study thorium fuel cycles were primarily: (i) whether there were sufficient uranium resources to ensure the long-term viability of a nuclear power program [32]; and (ii) whether "advanced nuclear fuel cycles improve the economic competitiveness of nuclear power, particularly in the event uranium becomes increasingly expensive" [32]. These primary supply questions led to a series of other economic-related questions [33][34][35]. For example, if Canada's uranium resources were depleted, how would Canada replace its exports of uranium to avoid an unfavorable trade balance?…”
Section: Primary Economic Motivations For Thorium Fuel Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thorium fuel cycle also does not result in significant formation of long‐lived, highly toxic transuranics that are inevitably formed in the uranium fuel cycle. In fact, the thorium fuel cycle is capable of destroying these transuranics using existing thermal reactors, where the uranium fuel cycle must utilize fast reactors to achieve similar net actinide destruction …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the thorium fuel cycle is capable of destroying these transuranics using existing thermal reactors, where the uranium fuel cycle must utilize fast reactors to achieve similar net actinide destruction. [1][2][3][4] Nitride fuels such as thorium mononitride (ThN) are intriguing options when compared to oxide fuels due to their substantially higher actinide density (11.17 g Th/cm 3 vs. 8.80 g Th/cm 3 for ThN and ThO 2 , respectively) obtained without the reduction in melt point that is suffered if metallic thorium is considered. Perhaps most importantly, previous investigations have suggested that ThN has a thermal conductivity in the range 35-50 WÁ(mÁK) À15-7 at temperatures relevant to nuclear reactor systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%