Use of the quality management system "JACIE" and outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Gratwohl, Aloïs; Brand, Ronald; McGrath, Eoin; Biezen, Anja van; Sureda, Anna; Ljungman, Per; Baldomero, Helen; Chabannon, Christian; Apperley, Jane F.

doi:10.3324/haematol.2013.096461

Cited by 86 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Adherence to a quality management system can improve survival and reduce costs. 14,15 Payers will understand this and will support such systems if professional organizations act decisively.…”

Section: Novel Approaches To Cancer Survivorship Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lessons learned from childhood cancer or hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors, their respective recommendations and guidelines, and the quality management systems "FACT" and "JACIE" could serve as a role model. 14 Competent authorities should recognize that reimbursement plans for primary treatment have to include data collection and data analysis as integral parts of the therapy. 16 Lifelong monitoring of cancer survivors has to be recognized as an essential tool to generate data to show if and how new treatments aim at both increasing survival rates and decreasing risks for non-malignant late effects, and how they are impacting on health, quality of life and cost effectiveness.…”

Section: Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cancer survivorship programs: time for concerted action

2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Novel Approaches To Cancer Survivorship Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cancer survivorship programs: time for concerted action

2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nine studies examined patient outcomes (CHABANNON et al, 2012;BRODRIBB;KRUSKE;MILLER, 2013;GRATWOHL et al, 2014;MERKOW et al, 2014;NOUWENS et al, 2014;SONG;LI;ZHOU, 2014;TOWERS;CLARK, 2014;FALSTIE-JENSEN et al, 2015;TELEM et al, 2015), out of which six revealed positive associations between accreditation and patient outcome measures. For example, bariatric hospital accreditation improved patient outcomes as compared to unaccredited hospitals and within the same hospital compared to pre-accreditation (TELEM et al, 2015).…”

Section: Relationship To Quality Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The relationship between accreditation program and quality measures were examined in 21 articles CASTLE, 2012a;CHABANNON et al, 2012;CASTLE, 2013;BRODRIBB;KRUSKE;MILLER, 2013;PEACOCK et al, 2013;PRONOVOST et al, 2013;RAJAMANI et al, 2013;KWON et al, 2013;NOUWENS et al, 2014;PARTHASARATHY;SUBRAMANIAN;QUAN, 2014;SONG;LI;ZHOU, 2014;TOWERS;CLARK, 2014; VAN DOORN -KLOMBERG et al, 2014;GRATWOHL et al, 2014;MERKOW et al, 2014;MORTON;GARG;NGUYEN, 2014;MUMFORD et al, 2014;BOGH et al, 2015;TELEM et al, 2015;FALSTIE-JENSEN et al, 2015;LIU et al, 2015). Following prior research, two key subthemes were explored in these studies, including indicators of organizational performance rates, along with patient or healthcare consumer outcomes.…”

Section: Relationship To Quality Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the Evolution of Health Service Accreditation Research: A Literature Review From 2012 to 2015

Saut¹,

Berssaneti²

2017

RAHIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoO objetivo deste estudo é investigar os temas centrais das pesquisas sobre acreditação. Este trabalho faz uma revisão da literatura sobre a acreditação nos últimos quatro anos e apresenta uma comparação dos resultados com uma revisão anterior, para analisar a evolução das publicações ao longo do tempo. A pesquisa identificou 90 estudos empíricos que examinam tanto os processos quanto os impactos de programas de acreditação. Os artigos foram classificados em nove categorias temáticas, sendo que oito categorias já haviam sido empregadas em estudos anteriores e uma emergiu dessa avaliação, relacionada à sustentabilidade programa de acreditação (n = 10). O número de publicações aumentou nos últimos anos. A maioria dos estudos foram dos Estados Unidos (n = 35) e Austrália (n = 14). Os resultados indicam uma tendência de aumento da colaboração internacional entre os pesquisadores. Na literatura recente, o número de estudos que indicam efeito positivo da acreditação é mais elevado do que o identificado nos trabalhos anteriores de revisão. Os pontos de vista em relação aos impactos financeiros, questões de pesquisa e profissionais de saúde permanecem menos claro. Palavras-chave: Acreditação; Saúde; Qualidade. Ana Maria Saut AbstractThe aim of this study is to investigate the core themes of accreditation research. This paper reviews the literature on accreditation in the last four years and compares the findings to a prior research to analyze the evolution of publication over time. The search identified 90 empirical studies examining either the processes or the impacts of accreditation programs. The articles were classified in nine thematic categories, whereas eight were employed by prior studies, one emerged from this review regarding the accreditation program sustainability (n=10). Publications number increased in the last years. The majority of studies were from the United States (n=35) and Australia (n=14). The findings indicate an increasing trend of international collaboration among researches. In the recent literature, the number of studies indicating positive effect of accreditation is higher than prior reviews. The views regarding financial impacts, survey issues and health professionals are less clear. Keywords: Accreditation, Health Care; Quality. ResumenEl objetivo de este estudio es analizar los temas centrales de la investigación de acreditación. Este trabajo es una revisión de la literatura sobre la acreditación en los últimos cuatro años y se comparan los resultados con la versión anterior, para analizar la evolución de las publicaciones a través del tiempo. La investigación identificó 90 estudios empíricos que examinan tanto los procesos como los impactos de los programas de acreditación. Los artículos fueron clasificados en nueve categorías temáticas, mientras que ocho fueron empleados por los estudios previos, uno surgido de esta revisión con respecto a la sostenibilidad de los programas de acreditación (n = 10). El número de publicaciones ha aumentado en los últimos años. La mayoría de los estu...

show abstract

“…In a recent, important paper on behalf of the EBMT and LeukemiaNet, Gratwohl et al [12] showed that the use of the JACIE quality management system improved outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Results became better in all centers over time, but they improved significantly faster and were more pronounced for patients transplanted in the context of accredited programs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chemotherapy Dose Adjustment for Obese Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Survey on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Shem‐Tov

Labopin²,

Moukhtari³

et al. 2014

The Oncologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with malignant diseases is a significant challenge because limiting chemotherapy doses in these patients may negatively influence outcome. There is a paucity of information addressing high‐dose chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods. The Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) designed an electronic survey to assess current practice of dose adjustment of chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing HSCT. Results. A total of 56 EBMT centers from 27 countries responded to the online survey. Overall, 45 centers declared that they routinely adjust chemotherapy doses for obese patients (80.5%), and only 11 (19.5%) declared they do not adjust dose. Among the former group, most used body mass index as the parameter for defining obesity (28 centers, 62%). The method for determining the weight for chemotherapy calculation was actual body weight (ABW) in 16 centers, ideal body weight (IBW) in 10 centers, IBW plus 25% of the difference between IBW and ABW in 16 centers, and other methods for the rest. Among centers that used dose adjustment, 44% also capped the dose at 2 m2 for a chemotherapy dose based on body surface area (BSA), whereas 56% did not cap. Interestingly, most of the centers (9 of 11) that did not adjust dose for weight also did not cap the BSA at 2 m2. Conclusion. This EBMT survey revealed large diversity among transplant centers regarding dose‐adjustment practice for high‐dose conditioning chemotherapy. Our next step is to analyze outcomes of transplantation according to dose‐adjustment practice and, subsequently, to formulate a methodology for future prospective studies.

show abstract

Use of the quality management system "JACIE" and outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cited by 86 publications

References 37 publications

Cancer survivorship programs: time for concerted action

Cancer survivorship programs: time for concerted action

Understanding the Evolution of Health Service Accreditation Research: A Literature Review From 2012 to 2015

Chemotherapy Dose Adjustment for Obese Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Survey on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About