2006
DOI: 10.1300/j075v25n03_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist to Select an Intervention Designed to Increase the Offering of Promotional Stamps at Two Sites of a Restaurant Franchise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Rodriguez et al (2005) studied restaurant workers who did not offer promotional stamps to customers on a frequent basis. The PDC identified insufficient consequences for the task and a subsequent treatment package that included feedback produced large improvements in the target behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rodriguez et al (2005) studied restaurant workers who did not offer promotional stamps to customers on a frequent basis. The PDC identified insufficient consequences for the task and a subsequent treatment package that included feedback produced large improvements in the target behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mager and Pipe Performance Analysis Flowchart is based entirely on behavior analytic theory and is a simple yet powerful tool for identifying the causes of and solving performance problems that looks to the work environment, policy, and managerial causes of performance concerns. Similarly, the Performance Diagnostic Checklist (Pampino, Heering, Wilder, Barton, & Burson, 2003; Rodriguez et al, 2005) is another theoretically derived managerial tool for identifying causes of performance deficiencies in terms of antecedents, equipment and processes, knowledge and skills, and consequences—the same potential causes cited by Pulakos and O’Leary.…”
Section: A Behavioral Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three methods of performance analysis exist: informant, descriptive, and experimental. The most popular method of performance analysis, the informant method, has been used to assess a variety of target performances, including poor customer service (Eikenhout & Austin, 2005), the offering of promotional stamps (Rodriguez et al, 2005), cash register shortages (Rohn, Austin, & Lutrey, 2003), and problems completing maintenance tasks (Austin, Weatherly, & Gravina, 2005). The most common type of informant-based assessment is the Performance Diagnostic Checklist, which was used in the aforementioned examples to identify variables contributing to poor performance in restaurants and retail stores (Austin, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%