2007
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.35825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the generalized linear models in data related to dental caries index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates can be extrapolated to 15-year-olds because there is a good relationship between caries levels at 12 and at other ages as shown in trend data. Among adults aged 26, with a DMFT score of 1.5 the prevalence of caries was 48% [Javali and Pandit, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates can be extrapolated to 15-year-olds because there is a good relationship between caries levels at 12 and at other ages as shown in trend data. Among adults aged 26, with a DMFT score of 1.5 the prevalence of caries was 48% [Javali and Pandit, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing with the Shapiro-Wilk W found that neither the number of natural teeth nor FTUs were normally distributed. Therefore, we used a generalized linear model (GLM) of the negative binominal distribution with a logit builtin link function (Lewsey and Thomson, 2004;Javali and Parameshwar 2008). For the GLM, the numbers of natural teeth and FTUs were treated as response variables and the diabetic status as an explanatory variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of analytical obstacle arose because some studies did not conduct or report statistical tests of intergender difference in caries prevalence or experience David et al, 2005), others stated that gender differences were significant, but did not indicate the direction of gender bias and some noted the direction and statistical significance of the gender difference, but did not report caries data by gender (Javali and Pandit, 2007;Rami Reddy et al, 1982a). When possible I contacted the author responsible for correspondence, requesting the missing data or statistical results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%